Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br />MINUTES OF UNIVERSITY CITY COUNCIL <br />STUDY SESSION <br />September 4, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br />The Council Study Session, held in the Chambers of the City Hall, on Monday, <br />September 4, 2007, was called to order by Mayor Adams at 5:30 p.m. In addition to <br />Mayor Adams, the following members of the Council were present: <br /> <br /> Mr. Robert Wagner <br /> Mr. Arthur Sharpe, Jr. <br /> Mr. Michael Glickert <br /> Ms. Lynn Ricci <br /> Mr. Byron Price arrived at 6:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Ms. Stefany Brot had an excused absence. <br />Also present were City Manager Ms. Julie Feier and the Director of Finance, Janet <br />Watson, Assistant City Manager, Petree Eastman and City Attorney, John Mulligan. <br /> <br />The Study Session agenda was planned to review for the Council the background of <br />University City’s collections on service fees for residential refuse collection. <br /> <br />The information provided was planned for the Council to review the background <br />information about the City’s collections’ problem. Next the Council discussed solutions <br />and issues that could arise for each action the City would take. Currently, the City has <br />nearly two million dollars in delinquent refuse service accounts. At the present, <br />properties with six or more bills have special tax bills issued and liens placed on the <br />properties. Options to be considered for delinquent collections are as follows: <br />foreclosure, eminent domain, stopping service, amending ordinance to make it unlawful <br />to accumulate trash or dump trash on others’ properties, amnesty and or reduced rates <br />for low income households, early intervention techniques, and free service with an <br />increase in property taxes to cover costs. <br /> <br />The City currently provides refuse and recycling service to all City residents under a <br />subsidized fee-based system. Payment for services comes from billing, mulch site in <br />Heman Park and grant funding provide the remaining cost. The delinquency-of- <br />payment, which is approximately 12% of billing, comes out of general revenue. <br /> <br />Current collection process includes: series of notices, report to a credit reporting <br />agency and issuance of a special tax bill which becomes a lien upon the property. The <br />last step would be to foreclose on the property which the City has not yet approached. <br />The lien is collected when the property is sold or refinanced. The reasons suggested <br />for the delinquency of payments were: cost of service too high for low household <br />income, lack of understanding what is a lien, but probably more prevalent is the belief <br />that there are no immediate meaningful negative consequences for non-payment. The <br />Council discussed the collection processes available and this will be summarized at the <br />September 24, 2007 <br />D-2-a <br /> <br />