Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3. Public Hearings <br /> None <br /> <br />4. Hearings <br /> None <br /> <br />5. Old Business <br /> None <br /> <br />6. New Business <br /> None <br /> <br />7. Other Business <br /> <br />7.a. Discussion Plan Commission feedback for potential Zoning Code Text Amendment <br />topics. INFORMATIONAL ONLY NO VOTE REQUIRED <br /> <br />Staff was seeking feedback from the Plan Commission members regarding Zoning Code <br />Text Amendments suggested by staff. The memo distributed by staff (see Attachment A) <br />included two lists of potential Text Amendment topics that may be addressed in the <br />future, the first list was for topics <br />was of less priority. The lists had come about through previous discussions with property <br />owners and developers, code enforcement and interpretation concerns, feedback from <br />City Council and Board/Commission members, and updated State and Federal laws. <br /> <br />Questions / Comments and Discussion by Plan Commission <br /> <br /> <br />In addition to the items included in the first list, Plan Commission members discussed <br />concerns about residential infill development and suggested that a review of the <br />effectiveness of the current residential infill development ordinance be added to the <br />bottom of the first list. <br /> <br /> <br />Plan Commission members also discussed the concern about the number of restaurants in <br />The Delmar Loop and the mix of uses. There was some concern about there being too <br />many restaurants and perhaps a limitation should be considered. It had been discussed <br />previously at Plan Commission meetings and there had been a sentiment to let the market <br />decide the mix of uses in The Loop. However, there could be other factors that affect the <br />businesses in The Loop and it should be discussed further. Perhaps a study session could <br />be scheduled for this item and possibly a temporary committee established to research the <br />concept. It could also be discussed at a Code Review Committee meeting. Plan <br />Commission members suggested that this item be added to the bottom of the first list. <br /> <br />7.b. Annual Report for calendar years 2015 2016. INFORMATIONAL ONLY NO <br />VOTE REQUIRED <br /> <br />Staff stated that the first annual report (see Attachment B) had been provided as <br />previously requested by the Plan Commission members. This annual report included the <br />past two years in order to provide a broader range of activity. Future Annual Reports <br />would only cover one calendar year. The Plan Commission was generally pleased with <br />this first annual report. <br />tğŭĻ Ћ ƚŅ Ќ <br /> <br />