Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approval for getting a second opinion was not unanimous and the report would be <br />finished in the coming weeks. Council had yet to discuss any ideas for future use of the <br />building. There were other pressing issues that had to be dealt with first. <br /> <br />Staff stated that Council had previously suggested that a citizen committee should be <br />formed to discuss future use of both buildings. <br /> <br />Questions / Comments and Discussion by Historic Preservation Commission <br /> <br />Commission members discussed the City Hall Annex and some of the existing <br />deficiencies and obstacles for rehabilitation of the building as well as potential formation <br />of a committee to examine future use of the building and what the role of the HPC should <br />be in the overall process. It was apparent that there was no rush from City Council to get <br />the process started immediately. They agreed that any ideas from individual members <br />should still be shared with City staff. <br /> <br />5.b. Public Comments <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />6. Reports <br /> <br />6.a. Council Liaison Report <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert stated the Council was working on approval of the budget as well as filling <br />-owned property at Olive <br />Boulevard and North and South Road was sold and was proposed to be the future site of a <br />brewery. <br /> <br />6.b. Department Report: Update from staff <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti stated that an RFP would soon be issued for reuse of the City-owned <br />property at Olive Boulevard and Midland Boulevard. The Text Amendment that was <br />recommended for approval by the HPC in June would be considered by the Plan <br />Commission later in July. <br /> <br />7. Adjournment <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:30 pm. <br />tğŭĻ Ћ ƚŅ Ћ <br />