Laserfiche WebLink
There were no public comments. <br />7.d. Election of Officers –Nomination and election of Chairperson, Vice-Chairperson, and <br />Designated Alternate <br />Ms. Williams nominated Ms. Moran to serve as Chairperson. The nomination was <br />seconded by Ms. Gainer and carried unanimously. <br />Ms. Moran nominated Ms. Williams to serve as Vice-Chairperson. The nomination was <br />seconded by Ms. Head and carried unanimously. <br />Ms. Moran nominated Mr. Miller to serve as the Designated Alternate. The nomination <br />was seconded by Ms. Gainer and carried unanimously. <br />Ms. Moran asked the Plan Commission members to think about which subcommittee <br />they would prefer to serve on, Comprehensive Plan Committee or Code Review <br />Committee, and to discuss their preference with her to help her appoint the two <br />committees. <br />8.Reports <br />8.a.Code Review Committee Report <br />–None <br />8.b. Comprehensive Plan Committee Report <br />Ms. Moran explained the role of the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee (CPAC) <br />for the benefit of the new Plan Commission members. She stated that the CPAC was in <br />the process of reviewing the draft document, prepared by the consultant, and that all <br />review comments from CPAC were now complete and to be sent to the consultant. They <br />had also created a list of next steps. The list will be provided to the Plan Commission for <br />reference. After all comments are provided to the consultants, theywill prepare an <br />updated draft of the document for CPAC to review and then go to the public for review. <br />After public review, the Plan would go to the Plan Commission and then to City Council <br />for final adoption. The Plan Commission has a major role in theComprehensive Plan <br />process and the CPAC acts in advisory capacity to the Plan Commission. <br />8.c. Council Liaison Report <br />–None <br />8.d. Department Report <br />–None <br />9. Adjournment <br />The meeting adjourned at7:50pm. <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />