My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-11-05 Regular
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2007
>
2007-11-05 Regular
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2009 4:43:54 PM
Creation date
1/25/2008 3:56:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
11/5/2007
SESSIONNUM
2059
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />asked about escrowing the money until the St. Louis County Municipal League has a <br />more definite schedule in place. Mr. Mulligan said that a separate check will go directly <br />to the St. Louis County Municipal League and would not be issued by University City. <br />Mayor Adams said the funds will be placed in a separate account by the league. Mr. <br />Price asked who would be picking a representative from University City to be on this <br />oversight committee. Mayor Adams said he assumed that he would be making an <br />appointment which would then be voted on by the total body of the league present. <br /> <br />Ms. Ricci repeated the previous statements made by others of why St. Louis County <br />Municipal League needed the money and how the money would be placed in a separate <br />account with an oversight committee. She then read what the ordinance before Council <br />said, “that it is used for the reimbursement of the league for revenues expended in its <br />legislation and settlement efforts to fund future services performed on behalf of the <br />league’s municipalities.” Ms. Ricci said that there was nothing in the ordinance about <br />protection, safe-guard or lobbyist. She felt this bill with the allocation to the St. Louis <br />County Municipal League was irresponsible decision on part of the Council given the <br />financial situation of the City and strongly objects to its passage. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner stated that the protection should be in place before Council votes on any <br />settlement allocation so due process can be obtained. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe, Jr. spoke of St. Louis County Municipal League’s importance and the value <br />cities receive for the amount of money allocated. <br /> <br />Roll Call vote: <br />Ayes: Ms. Brot, Mr. Sharpe, Jr., Mr. Price and Mayor Adams <br />Nays: Ms. Ricci, Mr. Wagner and Michael Glickert <br /> <br />Bill 8959 was passed with a majority and became ordinance 6714. <br /> <br /> <br />K. NEW BUSINESS <br />1. BILL 8960 <br />— An ordinance assigning a percentage of the Verizon settlement <br />proceeds to the St. Louis County Municipal League. <br /> <br />With passage of Bill 8959, this Bill 8960 became MUTE <br /> <br />2. BILL 8961 <br />— An ordinance approving a settlement agreement with Verizon wireless. <br /> <br />With the passage of Bill 8959, this Bill 8961 became MUTE <br /> <br />3. BILL 8962 <br />— Introduced by Mr. Sharpe, Jr. An ordinance amending Chapter 2.10 of <br />the University City Municipal Code, relating to the Department of Finance, by <br />repealing Section 2.10.060 thereof, relating to certain city contracts and purchases to <br />be approved by Council, and enacting in lieu thereof a new section to be known as <br />“Section 2.10.060 certain city contracts and purchases to be approved by Council”; <br /> <br />containing a savings clause. <br /> <br />4. BILL 8963 <br />— Introduced by Mr. Wagner. An ordinance vacating and surrendering all <br />rights and privileges for the use of a tract of land being part of a 10 feet wide utility <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.