Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1867 <br />January 27, 2003 <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff replied that a search did not locate records of any commitments <br />made during the 70's. He noted that University City had no reason to have any <br />input or records because the project was done entirely by the Metropolitan Sewer <br />District. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt verified that the Municipal Sewer District had never communicated <br />with the City on the project. The City Manager said that M.S.D. had been <br />contacted and asked if they have any records; they have reported that they could <br />not locate plans for anything other than work that was actually built. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman stated that, according to his recollection from having been on the <br />Council at the time, this portion of the project had been discussed with <br />Metropolitan Sewer District. At that time, they maintained that there were more <br />complications because another city was involved but would eventually complete <br />it. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt said that she recalled their commitment to complete the project in <br />sections and believed that there had to be some sort of record. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said that, as City Manager since 1980, the staff has striven for 23 <br />years to get the Metropolitan Sewer District to complete the project in response <br />to Council's request. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt declared that that she was not in favor of asking the residents to <br />share the costs in light of the amount of property that they have lost because of <br />the delayed completion and that she hoped for some sort of accommodation. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams then declared the Public Hearing closed. <br /> <br />AGENDA ITEM # 3) Site Plan - 7315 Olive - Not-for-Profit Place of Worship <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff recommended that the Council approve the site plan for use of an <br />existing facility (now King's Daycare Center) as a church. All ordinance <br />requirements had been met. He also suggested that approval should be <br />contingent upon continuation of litter control, conformity to zoning requirements, <br />installation of an approved landscape plan and the providing of no more than 49 <br />seats in the assembly area. The matter was coming before Council to make <br />them aware that the property would conceivably removed from the tax rolls. <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman inquired about the shared parking arrangement that was made <br />with another facility. Mr. Ollendorff replied that the ordinance allowed for such a <br />written agreement. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />