Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />-Will the service entrance be accessible for public use? Mr. Boyer stated that the public can <br />exit from this point but may not enter. <br /> <br />-Can there be a sign along Kingsland that says right-turn only at the entrance to the <br />development? Mr. Boyer stated that they can erect a sign at that location. <br /> <br />-Do you have an agenda for your meeting with Washington University, and are you going to <br />try to get the parcel to the south of the subject site? Mr. Mastin stated that there was no set <br />agenda for the meeting but they would like to discuss opportunities for a better arrangement <br />of property for both parties. <br /> <br />-Will the façade material be brick or a type of faux-brick? Mr. Mastin stated that the brick <br />used for the façade will be conventional brick. <br /> <br />Ms. Riganti state- <br />reasonable and compatible with the surrounding uses. She stated that although the subject <br />- <br />commended the development team for their ability to incorporate all of the necessary <br />elements, including parking and landscaping. She stated that curb-cuts will be addressed at a <br />later stage in the review process and ultimately it is the jurisdiction of St. Louis County. The <br />development team previously met with the Green Practices Commission and included some <br />recommendations. <br /> <br />The Commission inquired if the acquisition of the adjacent parcel to the south would <br />alleviate the tightness of the proposed development. Ms. Riganti stated that there could be <br />additional landscaping along that side of the development but acquiring that property cannot <br />be made a condition. Mr. Mastin also stated that they would use the additional space, if <br />required, as a landscaping buffer but did not know what the remainder of the site could be <br />used for at this time. <br /> <br />Public Comments None <br /> <br />A motion was made by Ms. Gainer to recommend approval of the proposed Zoning Map <br />Amendment with the attachments, including the preliminary development plan. The motion <br />was seconded by Mr. Miller and carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0. The recommendation <br />will be forwarded to City Council for a public hearing and consideration of final approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Moran proposed a brain-storming session be held by the Plan Commission regarding <br />public notifications to adjacent property owners and through various channels of notification. <br />She stated that their duty is to hear all sides of a proposal and they need to be creative <br />without increasing the burden on staff. Ms. Head suggested coordinating a strategy via email <br />rather than an extra meeting. Ms. Moran suggested a subcommittee be formed to meet with <br />staff regarding suggestions. Ms. Moran, Ms. Hartz, and Ms. Gainer will be on the sub- <br />committee and agreed to coordinate further following this meeting. <br /> <br />7. Other Business <br /> <br />7.a. Public Comments <br /> <br />tğŭĻ В ƚŅ ЊЊ <br /> <br />