Packet - 9-27-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

is proposed, and future showroom proposal would have to be brought back to Plan Commission for review. Code does not explicitly prohibit nor permit the proposed use. She explained that staff uses of the zoning district. use if its potential impact is uncertain. It would provide an opportunity for conditions to be imposed before the application moves forward in the approval process. -Mr. Miller motioned to consider adding an amendment to the conditions for an agreement on the landscaping plan, particularly along Sutter Avenue. Ms. Gainer seconded the motion. By a vote of 1-4, the motion failed. - staff. Ms. Hartz seconded the motion which was subsequently passed unanimously. Mr. Bierman added that he does not think the applicant should be subject to pursuing a Conditional Use Permit because of anticipated controversy. He stated that the proposed use is light manufacturing and machining although he has not seen the recommended conditions yet at this time. He appreciated that the community was able to His client, the applicant, would reserve the right to challenge the need for a CUP later. 4. Hearings None 5. Old Business None 6. New Business 6.a. Zoning Map Amendment PC 17-09 PD-M Planned Development-Mixed Use DistrD-RPlanned Development-Residential District (Assisted Living & Memory Care Facility) Kingsland Walk Senior Living, LLC (c/o Paul Boyer, Civil Engineering Design Consultants, Inc.) 6668 Vernon Avenue (at Kingsland Avenue) preliminary sketch plan and reminded the Commission members of the process for approval. Ms. Riganti explained Development zoning classification through a flow chart. She stated that this zoning classification was designed to allow for flexibility in the site plan and design so the development can better fit a property. Additionally, the zoning and the preliminary plan cannot exist without one other. tğŭĻ А ƚŅ ЊЊ