Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STAFF NOTES FROM 11/16/15 CPAC MEETING DISCUSSION – #2 of 2 CONSULTANT PRESENTATIONS ON <br />DRAFT COMP PLAN UPDATE <br /> <br />Chapter 1 Introduction <br />Is comp plan a policy document or blueprint, or both? <br />Chapter 2 Community Profile <br />Source of data (ESRI and US Census) <br />Graphics confusing <br />Olive area was covered in the Olive Blvd. Subarea Study <br />Unclear what “over-supply” and “under-supply” mean <br />Clarifications needed for retail gap analysis <br />Private Streets should be added to the map and text <br />Will financing mechanism be included? <br />U City should be separated from ‘Mid-County” <br />Explain relevance of U City data <br />Chapter 3 Community Outreach <br />No comments/discussion <br />Chapter 6 Transportation and Mobility <br />Remove proposed local street realignments north of Olive (committee consensus) <br />Road Diet - Is this a done deal with public input? <br /> - Show on-street parking in the diagram <br /> - Add clarifying sentences that this is an idea only, not definite <br /> - Road Diet concept causes drastic change to Olive, thus minimize the diagrams <br /> - Change the word “Alternative” to “Concept” <br />Add labels to illustrations and zoom in the pictures for legibility <br />People need to understand “Why” and “Relevance” of the comp plan <br />P. 47 Map - Legend for Red color missing <br /> - Plymouth Ave. extension is not clear <br />Maps should be placed near the relevant text to minimize confusion <br />P. 49 Map - Add bus route names (terminus) in the legend <br />Chapter 7 Parks, Open Space 7 Environmental Features <br />Some parks are mislabeled e.g. mini-parks should be neighborhood parks <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />