My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3-16-17
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Retail Sales Tax Commission
>
2017
>
Minutes
>
3-16-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2018 5:26:28 PM
Creation date
1/10/2018 5:26:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Following Ms. Riganti’s review of the memo, the Board began to deliberate on each project and vote on <br />funding. <br /> <br />Olive Blvd CID – Board is concerned about a return on value for an analysis. Mr. Edwards explained to <br />the Board that a Community Improvement District will provide added value by raising additional funds for <br />infrastructure, marketing, and other projects. Mr. Edwards indicated that the LSBD was approved for <br />funds for the same projects and hopes to become a CID in the near future, like the East Loop. Mr. <br />O’Donnell agreed with Mr. Edwards and stated that a CID would provide property owners with “skin in the <br />game”. Ms. Riganti explained to the Board that the property owners had requested the City start the <br />analysis. Board concerned that it funds analysis and no CID is form. That is a risk that will be taken. Mr. <br />Kuhlman made a motion for the Board to consider the Olive CID and the Market Analysis together since <br />they are both important Olive Blvd projects. Board approved funding $40,000 for CID and $50,000 for the <br />Olive Blvd Market Analysis by a vote of 6-1. <br /> <br />Olive Boulevard Sidewalk Improvements – Mr. O’Brien is concerned about the cost of the sidewalk project <br />going over budget, he thinks the requested amount is low. Ms. Lloyd explained that the cost was provided <br />by public works on a cost per linear foot and in addition, Public Works will first design the project and get <br />cost estimates from an engineer. At that time, Public Works can review the estimates with the Board. <br />There are several steps in the process. Ms. Williams questions why the EDRST funds have to pay for <br />sidewalks and not the City’s general fund. Ms. Riganti explained that Olive Blvd is a state roadway and <br />that the State of Missouri Department of Transportation will not fund sidewalks. The state doesn’t have <br />the funds to even maintain the highways. Mr. Kuhlman stated that infrastructure is very important and one <br />of the projects funded through state statute. Mr. O’Brien concurred that this is one of the most important <br />projects this year to be requested. Mr. Lenard asked about other elements of the streetscape that need to <br />be addressed on Olive Blvd like lighting, trees, etc. Ms. Lloyd explained that streetscape and <br />infrastructure projects are expensive and multi-year. For example, FY 17 EDRST funds upgraded all the <br />pedestrian-scale lighting on Olive Blvd and Delmar Blvd. Funds will also be used for five new bus <br />shelters. Mayor Welsch asked why Public Works was requesting funds for sidewalks and not street lights. <br />Ms. Lloyd explained that the City doesn’t own the street lights and the City would need to work closely <br />with Ameren to replace or upgrade the lighting with a cost into the millions. The Board voted 4-3 to fund <br />the Olive sidewalks with EDRST reserves. <br /> <br />Olive Boulevard Market Analysis – Approved 6-1 in conjunction with the CID <br /> <br />Create Space Generator – Board determined that without Create Space, there is a lost opportunity for real <br />Economic Development in U City. Ms. Williams stated that this is the exact type of project that the funds <br />should be used for. Create Space provides opportunities for students and entrepreneurs. Ms. Hendrix <br />stated that Create Space provides an opportunity for innovative young people. Mr. Lenard stated that he <br />is very supportive of Create Space and this concept of scholarships and programming removes the issue <br />of funding for equipment. The Create Space request is aligned with the state statute for use of EDRST <br />funds. Mr. Adeboye concurred and supports full funding for Create Space programs. The Board voted 7-0 <br />to fully fund both Create Space ($60,000) and Kitchen Space ($70,000). <br /> <br />Loop Special Business District Events – The Board supports staff’s recommendation to combine the <br />events in the Delmar Loop. The Board does think that the LSBD should determine which events are best <br />for all businesses in the Loop. Mr. Edwards explained that the Ice Carnival would be expanded to three <br />days and that other events help draw people into the Loop. Mr. Kuhlman acknowledged that the EDRST <br />Board has historically funded Loop projects and the funds are impactful. Ms. Hendrix questioned staff’s <br />decision to combine the events and doesn’t think the Board needs to continue funding projects just <br />because it’s always been done. The Board voted 6-1 to fund Loop events at $75,000 and for the LSBD to <br />use those funds for Loo events (including Ice Carnival), Mannequins in the Loop, and Midtown Farmers <br />Market events (Music, Chef Competition, etc.) <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.