My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-04-21 Regular Council Session Agenda
Public Access
>
City Council Agenda
>
2008
>
2008-04-21 Regular Council Session Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2008 6:54:52 AM
Creation date
4/18/2008 6:52:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
O&MURPA <br />LIVE IDLAND RBANENEWAL ROJECTREA <br />UCLCRA <br />NIVERSITYITY ANDLEARANCE FOR EDEVELOPMENT UTHORITY <br />The entire Area is zoned GC - “General Commercial District”. The requirements of the <br />GC zoning district dictate that: 1) Development must occur on sites of at least 0.3 acres; <br />2) The minimum property line setback requirement shall be twenty (25) feet if adjacent to <br />a residential district; and 3) Buildings and site improvements such as parking must not <br />occupy more than seventy (70) percent of the total land area of the parcel if it is 20,000 <br />square feet or greater in size. <br />Before Olive Boulevard was widened to four lanes, single family residential uses were <br />predominant along Olive Boulevard. The widening of Olive Boulevard increased the <br />number of commercial land uses along the Boulevard and many formerly single-family <br />Plate 1 <br />parcels were consolidated for commercial uses. As can be seen from the , the <br />platting of the parcels fronting Olive Boulevard in the Area reflects the pattern of platting <br />in the single-family subdivision immediately to the north. As is the case with Parcel 1, <br />the former single-family structure was converted into commercial uses while the <br />underlying platting did not change. Parcel 1 is of insufficient size (0.13 acres) and is a <br />non-conforming with the City’s zoning code for development within the GC zoning <br />classification. For example, the “parking area” at the rear of Parcel 1 may only be <br />accessed through the drive-aisle of Parcel 2. <br />The other minimum standards of the GC zoning classification effectively render any <br />parcel size less than 0.5 to 0.75 acres obsolete due to the limited number of commercial <br />uses that will meet off-street parking and loading requirements as well as green space, <br />landscaping and other site improvement guidelines for coverage on a property. <br />Contemporary retail and commercial development standards typically establish 0.5 to <br />0.75 acres as a minimum lot size to effectively meet the design and parking <br />requirements for end users and businesses. In addition, the City has implemented a <br />program of property acquisition and consolidation for purposes of promoting more easily <br />developable and unified redevelopment projects through the use of TIF. Redevelopment <br />of single properties below 0.5 to 0.75 acres would not encourage contemporary <br />development principles in support of unified and planned commercial development as <br />supported by the City. As such, Parcel 2 (0.47 acres) is also considered obsolete by <br />contemporary development standards and the City’s objectives for revitalization of the <br />Olive Boulevard corridor. <br />E. E <br />L <br />CONOMICIABILITY <br />The Area is an economic liability for the City due to the substandard property and sales <br />tax revenue generated within the Area. The estimated assessed value per square foot <br />of the properties (land and improvements) within the Area is $4.18. The estimated <br />assessed value of commercial properties within the City of University City is $5.51. The <br />valuation differential of approximately $1.33 per square foot equates to twenty-four (24) <br />percent less in real property tax revenue being generated within the Area as compared <br />Table 2-1, EAV <br />to the average for commercial properties within the City as a whole (see <br />per Square Foot <br />). The physical deterioration of buildings and site improvements, <br />inadequate street layout, and obsolete platting have impeded reinvestment in the <br />properties. These conditions contribute to lower lease rates and attract tenants unable <br />or unwilling to pay higher lease rates. These lower lease rates suppress the market and <br />assessed value of the property and also serve as a disincentive for reinvestment by <br />property owners. In many cases, the cycle of disinvestment continues unless public <br />assistance is provided to remedy impediments. <br /> ÐÙßÊ ËÎÞßÒ ÝÑÒÍËÔÌ×ÒÙ <br />6 <br />80759 <br />1/08/08 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.