Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1911 <br />February 9, 2004 <br /> <br />These items are unsightly when placed in front of houses, rather than behind them. He <br />urged using alleys for the purpose intended. He thinks there should be a policy to <br />govern the parking of service trucks behind houses, as well. <br /> <br />Shirley Richman, 840 Oakbrook Lane, and Joan Botwinick, 511 Westview Drive, came <br />to share information about the National Housing Trust Fund initiative with the City <br />Council in hopes of winning their support. This fund's purpose is to develop additional <br />Iow-cost housing, focusing upon housing production by means of rehabilitation, <br />preservation and new construction. Funding is through the Federal Housing <br />Administration surplus of FHA mutual mortgage insurance. In Missouri, it is expected <br />that funds would be administered through grants. It is a bi-partisan measure. It is <br />widely endorsed. They asked that University City be added to this list of supporters. <br /> <br />Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel, said the Northeast Plan addressed the trash collection pilot <br />program issues because this is an important matter, to which she finds little thought has <br />been given. The matter needs to be studied, in her opinion. Too many people share <br />too few dumpsters, despite the increase of trash collection fees. She favors roll-out <br />carts being placed in the alleys. She mentioned the problem of itinerant trash collectors <br />dumping trash in her alley, and suggested that perhaps camera surveillance should be <br />installed. She also suggested moving dumpsters to the other side of the alleys, so that <br />everyone has the opportunity to "host" one and experience the problems which <br />accompany that role and the hazards they present. She reiterated that the entire <br />process needs to be reviewed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Welsch agreed that this issue is a problem and that the system needs <br />to be examined; however, the City is actively trying to limit the constantly growing cost <br />of refuse collection. She said that it would be necessary to consider options, to try out <br />pilot programs, and to consider what the best way is for the long term. Ms. Glickert, <br />6712 Etzel, responded that the people who have alleys have different issues than ones <br />who do not: car damage and recycling costs to name tow, and that everything should <br />be in the alley. Mayor Adams then commented upon Ms. Welsch's comment about the <br />cost factors and the importance of managing them effectively, because other cities have <br />found it necessary to implement less desirable and expensive collection procedures <br />involving the use of bar codes and individual charges. Mr. Sharpe added that the City <br />Manager and the staff agreed that reducing collection expenses was an important issue <br />and one that affected the citizens greatly and needed to be shared with them. <br />Mr. Munkel commented that recycling efforts raised money and that University City had <br />managed to remove 25 to 30 per cent of materials from the waste stream by <br />undertaking efforts to recycle. He stated that refuse removal is not a problem ignored, <br />but one which requires an on-going effort to improve service. He noted that new efforts <br />need to be tried, and there needs to be a partnership with citizens, and that perhaps a <br />delay at this juncture will enable City Council and citizens to solve this problem. <br /> <br />Beverly Williams, 6509 Corbitt, attended this evening's meeting to validate and to lend <br /> Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />