My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pension Board Minutes 10.23.18
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Pension Board
>
2018
>
Minutes
>
Pension Board Minutes 10.23.18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2019 4:12:22 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 4:12:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
could perform this analysis since they already have the data and requested the Board <br />feedback on this matter. <br /> <br />Chairman Reedy commented that from fiduciary standpoint the Board has an obligation to <br />respect the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Krawzik commented that fiduciary responsibility is owed to the plan members and retirees <br />and the Board is required to plan to fully fund the plan as a goal. How they go about getting to <br />fully funded status is something the Board can recommend while being cognizant of budget and <br />affordability. An actuarial study to determine costing at different increased funding levels over <br />time could be a worthwhile tool for City Council discussion, but she would strongly advise <br />against saying that they want anything less than what the actuary recommends or the goal of <br />fully funding the plan. <br /> <br />City Manager Rose stated that he believes City Council wants a recommendation from him as to <br /> for them to review would be beneficial. <br /> <br />Member McCarthy mentioned the ever-increasing liability if we continue to fund at 80% due to <br />new employees entering the plan and new retirements and how we will continue to fund the plan <br />especially the police and fire plan which is further behind than the non-uniformed plan. He <br />mentioned he had suggested a tax increase for this purpose and questioned if the Board has an <br />obligation to try to fund somehow. <br /> <br />City Manager Rose commented that he contacted the state to find out the funding level for their <br />pension <br />what is a reasonable funding level to ensure the solvency of the pension plan far into the future? <br />The data is needed to advise and make a recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />Chairman Reedy suggested that the request should come from the City to the actuary not the <br />Board because from a fiduciary standpoint, the Board should not be blessing anything less than <br />fully funded plans. <br /> <br />City Manager Rose stated that as long as the Pension Board <br />would approach the actuary to make the request for the information. Chairman Reedy stated <br />that the pension fund should not absorb the cost of the requested analysis. <br /> <br />Treasurer Tina commented that due to the timing of the budget and receiving the actuary <br />reports, the budgeted amounts for contributions were less than the recommended <br />contributionsabout $50,000 for non-uniformed and a lot for police and fire. Member McCarthy <br />commented that police and fire was short about $700,000 because the tax financing is being <br />used but no City <br /> He stressed the <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.