Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1919 <br /> <br />MINUTES OF THE UNIVERSITY CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />May 10, 2004 <br /> <br />At a duly posted study session of the City Council of University City held in the E.O.C. <br />room in the basement of City Hall, on Monday, May 10, 2004, Mayor Joseph Adams <br />called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. In addition to Mayor Adams, the following <br />members of Council were present: <br /> <br />Ms. Cassandra Colquitt <br />Ms. Francine Brungardt <br />Mr. Robert Wagner <br />Ms. Stefany Brot <br />Ms. Shelley Welsch <br />Mr. Arthur Sharpe, Jr. <br /> <br />Also present was the City Manager, Mr. Frank Ollendorff. <br /> <br />COMMENTS ON REVENUE FOR GENERAL FUND <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff explained that first he would go through all the major revenue sources <br />and then review all the expenditures, pointing out any changes or anything unusual, he <br />than asked Council to look at page B-7, listing revenue. <br /> <br />Last year's grand total was $26.4 million; this year's is $26.7, representing an <br />increase of approximately $300,000. That much is needed to give equitable <br />cost-of-living increases to employees. <br /> <br />· There are two or three very small program expansions asked for by the Council. <br /> <br />State law allows increased property tax for new construction only, and a small <br />amount for increased property values. Property values could increase greatly in <br />the new year, because University City houses are worth twenty percent more that <br />they were. The City is allowed to add some percentage points a year for the <br />increased value. Growth in property tax comes from new construction, not from <br />houses becoming more valuable. <br /> <br />A second way to increase property tax revenue is to vote for a rate increase. <br />Voters can be asked for up to a one dollar increase; the current rate is about fifty <br />cents. In previous years the City Council preferred to pursue other revenue <br />sources than increased property tax because it is not popular with constituents. <br />Property tax projection for next year is $3.1 million, slightly higher than the $3 <br />million collected this year, leaving the property tax rate the same as it was. <br /> <br /> <br />