My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-03
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2004
>
2004-05-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:13 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 11:51:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/3/2004
SESSIONNUM
1918
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Session 1918 <br />May 3, 2004 <br /> <br />managing facilities. Ms. Brungardt said that perhaps the money saved through the <br />Midwest contract, averaging $9,426 per year, may not offer a valuable trade-off. Her <br />own experience with out-side services were that they can become a "headache" and <br />she prefers to keep things as they are. <br /> <br />Councilmember Brot suggested charging more for swimming lesson without changing <br />the pool management. She supports Midwest Pools being required "to give preference <br />to" being part of the contract. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said that this measure is not about raising money, but about providing <br />better supervision and management of the pool operation. When he approaches the <br />Council he must see that the new proposal shows where the money comes from or how <br />the contract will even save money. This issue is not about saving money, but securing <br />a more professional supervision and management of the pool. He said that he would <br />make certain that the contract is worded firmly, so that University City Human <br />Resources Department specifies who gets hired; that it will be a requirement. He is <br />happy to include suggestions and accept criticism, but asks that they defer to the City <br />Staff in managing the operations of the pool. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot asked if the Park Commission voted to support this measure and why, and the <br />City Manager said that they received the same information as the Council had, including <br />the report from the Director of Parks, and that they, too, wanted residents to be hired <br />and to know that staff would not be lost. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe said the Council really did not have to discuss this issue, per se, because <br />the City Manager has the responsibility to manage the pool. He said the current <br />discussion was actually focusing upon the City Manager's management style, when the <br />actual decision was to determine which company should be hired, as the best bidder. <br />He said he did not necessarily agree with having a management team, but that the <br />decision was the City Manager's to make. Mr. Sharpe said questions raised had been <br />answered, and whether or not it is a good or bad idea is not the issue. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt said that she does not favor the lifeguards being part of a "pool of <br />employees" who can be sent to other pools to work. <br /> <br />Mr. Ollendorff said these were excellent points and will be included in the contract: to <br />hire or maintain current University City lifeguards, to guarantee them job security, and to <br />assure that they would not be transferred to another pool. <br /> <br />Ms. Colquitt wondered if another staff person could be hired to supervise pool staff, in- <br />stead of hiring a pool management service, and Mr. Ollendorff said that such a person <br />would come with less expertise than Midwest Pools, and that the main point was hiring <br />Midwest Pools for their expertise. <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.