Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Session 1548, Minutes <br />June 17, 1991 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Ms. Patricia Ganlett, 1163 Partridge, said the Social Concerns Camnission of <br />All Saints Parish had grave concerns about the chanJes requested by the Real <br />Estate Board, especially as they relate to segregated housing. She said it <br />was felt that property north of Olive has not been shCMl1 on the open market <br />for many years, which was an irrlication of real estate steering. She said <br />many residents of the Parish have attested that properties on their blocks <br />have not been sh.own to white buyers for same time. '!he Canunission is asking <br />the Council to demam that realtors return all University City properties to <br />the open market, arrl that Bills 8020, 8021 arrl 8022 be tabled until such time <br />as the st. louis real estate carrnnunity addresses this problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Joe Myers, 7052 Ca1rden Court, did not urrlerstan::i why chan:Jes were needed <br />in the real estate ordinances. He said realtors do not show' hames in his <br />area to white buyers, arrl there is redli.ni.rg going on. He felt it should not <br />be made easy for realtors to pursue activities that resegregate neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Mrs. Bette Strawder, 6806 Plynnlth, said there should be a public hearing on <br />the bill that pennits changes to the solicitation ordinance. She also said <br />it had been many years since a home in her neighborhood had been purdlased or <br />even shown to a white family. She did not feel these bills would promote the <br />kim of changes desired by the carrnnunity. <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Hein, 7870 Trenton, said not one white family has moved into a <br />hane on his block in the last 25 years. He said it seemed rather st:rarX]e <br />there would not be any white buyers in that time Period, so he did not feel <br />any concessions should be given to the Real Estate Board until all University <br />City homes are put on the open market. <br /> <br />Ms. Elsie Glickert, 6712 Etzel, said she read in the citizen Joumal that the <br />Real Estate Board asked the city Council to drop past real estate policies. <br />'!hose policies have helped stabilize neighborhoods, she said, arrl asked that <br />the bills be deferred at least until all councilmembers are present. She <br />said IOC>St neighborhoods are now stable, corrpared to the 60s arrl 70s, when <br />blatant solicitation arrl threats by realtors frightened people into selling <br />their hames, often at a loss. She felt the present laws have SEUVed the City <br />well arrl should not be changed. She said the Real Estate Board has en:Jaged <br />in institutional racism through steering, arrl this perpetuated segregated <br />neighborhoods, which she felt University citians do not want. She sugtJested <br />no changes be made until all University City properties are listed on the <br />open market; the Real Estate Board can then cane to the City with its request. <br />She provided a rnnnber of statements fram residents that said properties on <br />their blocks have not been shown to white buyers for varying rnnnbers of years. <br /> <br />Mrs. 'lhCl!l'pSOIl agreed that all University City property should be on the open <br />market, but said living in a mixed neighborhood did not make that area better. <br />She moved that all three bills be tabled until it is known whether redlining <br />arrl steering is going on now in University City. Mr. Wagner secorrled if that <br />meant until such time as the full Council was present. Mrs. 'Ihonpson agreed. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoarner did not object to delaying the vote, but asked that the secorrl <br />readings be held now, arrl the final readings arrl discussion at the next meet- <br />ing. '!he Council concurred, arrl all voted Aye on the mtion. <br />