Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Session 1574, Minutes <br />July 6, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />public hearing since it is part of the Zoning Code. Mr. Wagner said the or- <br />dinance was originally suwosed to address the sight line fran the street so <br />the unfinished side of the fence did not face the street. He did not believe <br />it was interned to al;:ply to fences facing the alley or those between neigh- <br />bors. He felt repealing the ordinance was too severe, ani that it could be <br />satisfactorily amerrled to meet m:>st d::>jections. Ms. Smith also thought it <br />could be c:l'1anJed so that only fences facing the street are affected. '!here <br />was further discussion, ani Mr. Adams asked that a public hearing be held to <br />discuss repeal of the fence ordinance. It was so ordered for July 27, 1992. <br /> <br />BIT J'!:; FOR SECX>ND AND 'lHIRD READINGS <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8063 - FIXING '!HE <XMPENSATION '10 BE PAID '10 CITY OFFICIAIS AND EM- <br />PIDYEES FRCM AND AFTER JULY 1. 1992. REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 5847. <br />Bill No. 8063 was given its secorxi reading. <br /> <br />Bill No. 8063 was given its third reading. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner IOCJVed that this bill be adopted as an ordinance. Mrs. Schuman <br />secorxied the nDtion. Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: AYES: <br />eouncil.members Price, Adams, Wagner, Schuman, Schoamer, 'Ih.on'pson, ani Mayor <br />Majerus. NAYS: None. Bill No. 8063 became Ordinance No. 5852. <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8064 - AMENDING aJAPl'ER 2 MUNICIPAL roDE RElATING '10 AI:MINISTRATION <br />BY REPEALING SECI'ION 2-7.1 AND ENACI'ING IN LIEU 'l'HEREX)F A NEW SECI'ION '10 BE <br />I<NCMN AS "SECl'ION 2-7.1. FEES FOR USE OF CITY AMElJIANCE," '10 INCREASE '!HE <br />FEE FRCM $140 '10 $150; AND '10 ADD A $25 FEE FOR CERI'AIN SERVICES AND PROVIDE <br />FOR A MUlUAL AID RECIPROCAL FEE. <br />Bill No. 8064 was given its secorxi reading. <br /> <br />Bill No. 8064 was given its third reading. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoc::aoor IOCJVed that this bill be adopted as an ordinance. Mrs. 'Ih.on'pson <br />secorxied the nDtion. Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: AYES: <br />Councilmembers Adams, Wagner, Schuman, Schc:x::llller, '!hampson, Price, ani Mayor <br />Majerus. NAYS: None. Bill No. 8064 became Ordinance No. 5853. <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8065 - REPEALING SECI'ION 22-7 (a) MUNICIPAL roDE RElATING '10 NUI- <br />SANCES GENERALLY AND SPECIFICAILY '10 GRAFFITI, AND ENACI'ING IN LIEU 'l'HEREX)F A <br />NEW SECl'ION 22-7 (a) SO AS '10 DEIEI'E '!HE REFERENCE '10 '!HE PROPERIY MAINI'ENANCE <br />roDE. <br />Bill No. 8065 was given its secorxi reading. '!he third reading was postponed, <br />as noted above. <br /> <br />BIT J'!:; FOR INl'ROIXJCrION <br /> <br />BILL NO. 8066 - FIXING '!HE aMPENSATION '10 BE PAID '10 FIRE CAPI'AINS AND FIRE- <br />FIGHI'ERS FRCM AND AFTER JULY 1, 1992, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 5815, AND (X)N- <br />TAINING AN EMERGENCY ClAUSE. <br />A bill was introduced by eouncilmember Schc:x::llller, entitled: <br /> <br />"AN ORDINANCE FIXING '!HE aMPENSATION '10 BE PAID '10 '!HE FIRE CAPI'AINS AND <br />