03/16/1992 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1565, Minutes March 16, 1992 regated fran the rest of the neighbortlood, whidl will certainly affect their property values negatively. She read fran Planning Director Goldman's Febru- ary 18 letter whidl outlined the prablens inherent in the proposed construc- tion in regard to parki.n], transitional yards, laIDscapin;J am other items. Page 6 Mr. Tam Garfinkel, 8029 Delmar, said he am his wife were ~ to the pro- posed synagogue since it will be a non-residential use in a residential area. He urrlerstood there was legal precedent that asserted the city could not re- fuse a dlurch or synagogue, :but the precedent was a synagogue on a site many times larger than this one, am he could not l.ll"rlerstarn how it applied in this situation. He felt the City's zoni.rg Code should be strictly enforced. Mr. Mark Drazen, 8211 Gannon, said he felt the proposed synagogue would have a beneficial effect not only on this neighbo:rhood, :but all of University City. He said many families lOClVed to University City because of Young Israel, and they are very haR'Y' with that dloice and want to stay here. Mr. Richard Hagedorn, 8034 Gannon, said he loves livin;J in University City, but is very concen1Erl about the value of his house if the proposed synagogue is built. In addition, he had doubts about the structure itself-design, layout, setbacks, parki.n], etc. --as pointed out in Mr. Goldman's letter. He said the zonin;J Code should be enforced, especially setbacks am plantin;Js. Mr. Mark Wiseman, 8038 Gannon, questioned the need for i.ncreasin;J the density of Orthodox facilities in this area, notin;J there were at least four within a 1.5 square mile area. He said the relocation was for prestige, but Young Is- rael has not shown social responsibility to its current neighbors, nor is its property well kept. He said that over the years members have located their homes at a conscious distance fran the synagogue rather than integrate a pre- dominantly African-American neighbo:rhood, and while followin;J their own laws to the letter, apparently expect the City to make exceptions to the zonin;J Code to ac::cc:moodate this proposal. Mr. Ewald Winker, Jr., 8115 Delmar, lives three doors west of the proposed synagogue site, am as a long-time City resident am enployee, he felt all were treated equally when it came to City services. He asked Council not to let fear of a lawsuit or political ramifications influence its decision on what is fair, adding that 10 or 12 families would be severely hurt if this synagogue is built in the middle of a residential area. He was shocked, he said, when the Plan Camnission did not aocept Mr. Goldman's reconmerx3ations. Mr. Russ Roberts, 717 Radcliffe, said the proposed location of Young Israel is closer to his home than the old one, am other members have lOClVed away from the current synagogue since neart>y houses are very small. He said he was saddened by the anger am fears expressed by earlier speakers whidl he thought were unfoun:led, and in fact, he believed the area would benefit ec0- nomically if the synagogue is allowed. Mr. Schoomer said nothi.rg can be done legally to prevent Young Israel from usin;J the property in question for a synagogue since that issue was already decided by the courts. '!he next step is to firrl ways of protectin;J neighbors who may be inpacted by the proposal. He believed councilmembers felt the conditions suggested by the Planning Director to the City Manager should be