My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/09/05 Budget Study
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2005
>
05/09/05 Budget Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2005 12:39:51 PM
Creation date
6/9/2005 12:39:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
5/9/2005
SESSIONNUM
1964
TYPE
BUDGET STUDY
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Budget Study Session <br />May 9, 2005 <br /> <br />know what it is for a Metro station, which offers a different kind of fire threat than a <br />normal building. It is necessary to find out if it leads to a different standard. Ms. <br />Colquitt asked Mr. Ollendorff to find out more. She wants to move the fire station at City <br />Hall to another location, but Mr. Ollendorff said the fire station need to be in close <br />proximity to the Loop, which is a dense area with a high fire threat. Ms. Colquitt posed <br />some additional questions about the locations of fire houses and made some <br />suggestions about moving existing ones. Discussion about these issues followed. The <br />same people operate the ambulances as operate the fire trucks, and therefore, must <br />meet all the same proximity requirements. Ms. Brungardt commented that it is <br />important to have the “hazmat” people and the “bio-terror team” close to the Metro <br />station. These concerns must be discussed. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch asked why 725.05 line for sewer doubled? MSD rates have increased and <br />currently the City is “over budget.” Prices are increasing. Mayor Adams asked what <br />happens if a resident does not pay his bills and the response was the utility will get <br />turned off and possibly the pipes may get dug up. <br /> <br />10.19 – Public Relations. <br /> <br />There are no major changes. Some funds were added this year but have not been <br />spent. Those increases will remain for next year to provide some additional specialized <br />publications, which have not been defined fully as yet. They are spread throughout the <br />budget, in various places, in staff time, printing, and postage. Senior publications for <br />those who live independently are the number one need. A second publication will be <br />aimed at the business community. <br /> <br />Mayor Adams asked if some funds could be included in the budget for the Centennial <br />Celebration, and Mr. Ollendorff said 723.01, which was left out of the budget, was <br />meant to provide some funds for this purpose, $20,000 for publicity. Some other line <br />items were enhanced, such as 721.10, 722.03, but the main item was not entered. <br /> <br />Ms. Brungardt requested that “faces of City Councilmembers” should not be featured on <br />Centennial brochures, that the City should be featured. Mr. Ollendorff asked others if <br />they agreed with this; some said they did. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner asked about 732.32 and why there was no money for signs? Some <br />discussion about bulletin boards, signs, and kiosks followed. Mr. Wagner asked for <br />money for signs to be posted at Midland and Vernon, a double one, for about $10,000 <br />to $12,000. The amount of $12,000 was added to the budget. Discussion followed. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch said signs are an important part of informing the citizens. She would like to <br />work with staff to enlarge the type of information that is shared, so they become more <br />“community bulletin boards.” She went on record again saying she wanted to review <br />the “CityScape” publication format and make it more like the “Employee Spotlight” <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.