Laserfiche WebLink
Regular meeting <br />June 27, 2005 <br /> <br />Ms. Brot stated that she would really like to pass this pilot program. She said that they <br />have worked on this for months. She has attempted to make the reforms that her <br />colleagues have suggested and they were rejected by city staff. She believes that this <br />is where we should start, because once this is opened up, as her colleague, Ms. <br />Colquitt points out, we will have all kinds of people here protesting and it may never be <br />passed. Since it is a pilot, depending on how the chicken owners comply with the <br />ordinance and don’t sell the eggs, then we can come back and make changes to it. It is <br />her feeling that if the Council doesn’t pass this tonight, she isn’t sure that it can be done <br />in the future. Since her very easy amendment was not supported, then she would <br />request that the bill be adopted tonight. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch, seeing the point that Mr. Wagner and Ms. Brot are making, asked Mr. <br />Wagner that if the bill is adopted tonight, could Ms. Spencer ask for a variance in the <br />placement of the coop in the much smaller yards in the north part of the city. Mr. <br />Wagner said sure, but the whole thing is open to improvement and he is not opposing <br />any improvement. He thinks we need to get the bill in place, otherwise we may, as Ms. <br />Brot pointed out, lose the whole thing. Ms. Welsch said that in that case, she would like <br />to support Mr. Wagner and Ms. Brot. Ms. Welsch wants to make sure that it is made <br />clear to the City Manager that there are concerns with the bill, as it relates to the fee, <br />the placement of the coops – the site plan and the size of the coops. She hopes the <br />staff will remember that the Council is interested in being open to changes in the <br />ordinance as written this evening. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe said that he was not privy to the crafting of this bill at all. He has some <br />concern about passing something like this without a public hearing. He doesn’t know if <br />he is in favor of it or not, but to pass this without hearing individuals who may live close <br />to the chicken owners, doesn’t seem quite right. He understands his colleague’s <br />concerns about passing this bill tonight because of the fact that many individuals may <br />become very upset about the Council attempting to pass a chicken ordinance. His <br />colleagues have worked hard on crafting this bill, but he disagrees with passing it <br />without citizen input. <br /> <br />Ms. Brot explained to Mr. Sharpe that she had asked about the need to have a public <br />hearing, and she was told that a public hearing was not needed because it is not a new <br />ordinance; it’s a modification of an ordinance that already exists. She and Mr. Wagner <br />could have attempted to lobby for this bill’s passage on their own, but they felt that <br />getting other individuals involved that were intimate with the details of keeping and <br />raising chickens, as well as, the statement from Dr. Heineman speaking on the minimal <br />risks to the community - it was thought that all the bases were covered. There is some <br />public here tonight, but a public hearing was not required, so again, she would like to <br />urge adoption of this ordinance. <br /> <br />Ms. Welsch pointed out that this bill has been publicized since early June on two <br />meeting’s dockets. She agrees with Ms. Brot that there does not need to be a public <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />