Laserfiche WebLink
Regular meeting <br />July 18, 2005 <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe moved for adoption and Mr. Wagner seconded the motion. The Roll Call <br />vote was as follows: AYES: Ms. Brot, Mr. Sharpe, Ms. Colquitt, Ms. Brungardt, Mr. <br />Wagner, and Mayor Adams. NAYS: Ms. Welsch. Bill number 8803 passed and <br />became Ordinance number 6573. <br /> <br />5. BILL NO. 8804 – AMENDING CHAPTER 2.64 OF THE UNIVERSITY CITY <br />MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO THE NONUNIFORMED EMPLOYEES <br />RETIREMENT SYSTEM, BY REPEALING SECTION 2.64.040 THEREOF, <br />RELATING TO MEMBERSHIP, AND BY REPEALING SECTION 2.64.070 <br />THEREOF, RELATING TO CREDITABLE SERVICE; AND ENACTING IN LIEU <br />THEREOF NEW SECTIONS SO AS TO MAKE THE CITY MANAGER A <br />MEMBER OF THE RETIREMENT SYSTEM AS OF THE FIRST DAY OF HIS OR <br />HER APPOINTMENT TO WORK BY THE CITY. <br /> <br /> (HELD OVER) <br />6. BILL NO 8805 – FINDING THAT A CERTAIN BLIGHTED AREA AS DEFINED IN <br />SECTION 99.320 RSMo, (THE “STATUTE” BEING SECTIONS 99.300 TO <br />99.715 INCLUSIVE), EXISTS IN THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY CITY (“CITY”) AND <br />CONTAINING A DESCRIPTION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID BLIGHTED <br />AREA.,ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HERERIN AS EXHIBIT <br />“1”, KNOWN AS THE 6855-57 PLYMOUTH REDEVELOPEMENT AREA <br />(“AREA”); FINDING THAT REDEVELOPMENT AND REHABILITATION OF THE <br />AREA IS IN THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS <br />AND GENERAL WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY; APPROVING THE <br />REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE 6855-57 PLYMOUTH REDEVELOPMENT <br />PROJECT AREA, DATED JUNE 9, 2005 FOR THE AREA (“PLAN”), <br />INCORPORATED HEREIN BY ATTACHED EXHIBIT “2”, PURSUANT TO <br />SECTION 99.430 OF THE STATUE: FINDING THAT THE PLAN IS FEASIBLE <br />AND CONFORMS TO THE GNEAL PLAN FOR THE CITY; FIDING THAT NO <br />PROPERTY IN THE AREA MAY BE ACQUIRED BY THE LAND CLEARANCE <br />FOR REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITYOF UNIVERSITY CITY <br />(“LCRA”) THROUGH THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN; FINDING THAT <br />THE REDEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH <br />THE CITY’S RELOCATION POLICY; FINDING THAT TAX ABATEMENT IS <br />NECESSARY TO ENABLE THE AREA TO BE REDEVELOPED IN <br />ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN; FIDING THAT THERE SHALL BE <br />AVAILABLE SIX (6) YEAR TAX ABATEMENT; AND PLEDGING <br />COOPERATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND REQUESTING VARIUS <br />OFFICIALS, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS AND AGENCIES OF THE CITY TO <br />COOPERATE AND TO EXERCISE THEIR RESPECTIVE POWERS IN A <br />MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN. <br /> <br />The bill was given its second reading. <br />Page 17 <br /> <br />