My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-01-25 Regular City Council Agenda
Public Access
>
City Council Agenda
>
2010
>
2010-01-25 Regular City Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2010 5:50:46 PM
Creation date
1/22/2010 5:50:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Petree stated that presently the City is having a great deal of trouble finding a lender who <br />would finance a buyer in the amount of $150,000 to $200,000 when most of the homes on <br />the two blocks range from $50,000 to $100,000. She stated the appraiser that she talked to <br />said the more lots you have the more willing a bank might be to do a big project. Ms. Petree <br />asked if the Council would want to buy five more, when the first five will be difficult to sell. <br />Mr. Crow asked Ms. Eastman what the holding cost of the County owned lots would be. It <br />was explained that the City is presently mowing the lots now and place a lien on the house <br />for its charge so a lot of liens against it are the City’s liens. He stated that if the Council <br />went into this, the City could own the lots for a long time. <br />Mr. Glickert asked Ms. Eastman if she had seen anything like what the City is experiencing <br />now. She stated that it is unusual because a developer is not taking the risk and borrowing <br />the money and building, hoping buyers will come. This situation is where the City relies on <br />the buyer to get construction lending to build the homes. Mr. Glickert asked Ms. Petree on <br />the five lots the City has, with no developer, or construction company, if we had five <br />qualified buyers at this time. Ms. Petree said there is interest but since we cannot market <br />lots without a lender, it would seem to be the City would be acting in bad faith. <br />Mr. Price stated the issue to him is not whether you get a lender today. The issue is when <br />you have a lot site control there is more control of what eventually ends up there. The issue <br />to him is to be visionary on this issue and not short sighted. Ms. Petree stated that the City <br />is presently interviewing several construction companies to step in. A go ahead has been <br />given to the architect to design the houses making it easier to sell the houses once you <br />have a design. She stated that the City is going full steam ahead on this project but the <br />question is does the City want to invest in more property not knowing and having some <br />uncertainty of its success. Mr. Price stated there is always uncertainty but there is more risk <br />in doing nothing. He stated that it is not true that the County owned lots will not go up in <br />value as anyone could purchase it for the back taxes now and if the City want it in the <br />future, that person who purchased it would ask for a profit from what he paid the County for <br />it. Mr. Price now moved to buy the priority lots of 6633 Bartmer and 6628 Crest and pursue <br />the legal work on the five owned County lots: 6615 Crest, 6628 Etzel, 6508 & 6510 Bartmer <br />and 6640 Chamberlain. Ms. Eastman noted she was aware of a $9,000 mortgage due on <br />6633 Bartmer property and 6615 Crest had a mortgage due of $42,000 which would come <br />encumbered with that from the St. Louis County. <br />Mr. Sharpe stated he agreed with Mr. Price and stated that there would some advantage to <br />have those properties in hand.If the City was able to get them at some reasonable price, it <br />would seem to him to go in all due haste to purchase them. <br />Mayor Adams asked for all in favor of purchasing 6633 Bartmer and 6628 Crest and any <br />trustee lots they could pick up. Ms. Feier stated that if Council moves this project forward <br />that no money will be needed in the present fiscal year but it needs to be noted that a lot of <br />staff time will be spent on it this year and money will have to be incorporated in the FY 11 <br />budget. It was approved by a majority with a NAY vote from Mr. Glickert. <br />Ms. Feier asked the Council to go outside of the agenda and move the resolution up on the <br />agenda concerning the double-decker bus. Mr. Wagner moved to suspend the Robert’s Rules <br />of Order to hear the Resolution given by the Robotics group from Brittany Woods on the <br />proposal for a double-decker bus in the Loop area. <br /> 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.