Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minutes - Plan Commission <br />Page 4 <br />February 26, 1986 <br /> <br />After a considerable amount of discussion, Ms Schuman moved that the Commission <br />recommend to City Council that the rezoning request be denied. Ms Cook seconded <br />the motion. The Chairman called for further discussion and Mr. McCauley noted <br />that the Commission was pleased to hear the Midland Group's proposal and that it <br />did take the rezoning request seriously. He stated that the city was interested <br />in building up its revenues and developing its real estate stock. Mr. McCauley <br />noted that the small shopping centers in University City generally were assets to <br />the neighborhood, but was not sure that the proposal for 951 Hanley Road was <br />proper for the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Murtha suggested that the <br />Commission postpone action on the rezoning request in order to provide the <br />Midland Group more time to visit alternative sites for their proposal within <br />University City. Mr. McCauley moved to table the motion made by Ms Schuman <br />recommending denial and Mr. Rice seconded the motion. After much discussion <br />Chairman Hamilton called for a vote on Mr. McCauley's motion to table; the vote <br />was 3-3 and failed for a lack of majority. Chairman Hamilton called for a vote <br />on the motion to recommend denial of the request to rezone 951 Hanley Road; the <br />vote was 3-3 and failed for a lack of majority. After much discussion concerning <br />the preferred land uses for the property using the existing building, Mr. Rice <br />moved to postpone action on the request to rezone 951 Hanley Road until the next <br />Plan Commission meeting. Mr. McCauley seconded the motion. The Chairman called <br />for further discussion. Ms Cook stated that she objected to trucks and traffic <br />in that neighborhood as it would change its ambiance. The proposed stores would <br />not support the neighborhood lifestyle and the proposal to zone the land for a <br />park on the north side of the parcel would not be a proper buffer for the <br />neighborhood. Chairman Hamilton called for a vote on Mr. Rice's motion to <br />postpone action on the request. The vote on the motion was 3-3 and failed for a <br />lack of a majority. At this time Mr. McCauley made a motion to send the rezoning <br />request to Council with no recommendation. Mr. Rice seconded the motion. The <br />vote on the motion was 3-3 and failed for a lack of a majority. Chairman <br />Hamilton then closed discussion on this agenda item, noting that the Commission <br />was unable to agree on any recommendation to make to the City Council regarding <br />it. <br /> <br />PRESENTATION OF A MASTER PLAN FOR THE CIVIC PLAZA HISTORIC DISTRICT <br /> <br />Lisa Van Amberg, Chairperson of the Historic Preservation Commission, introduced <br />other members of the Historic Preservation Commission, Mr. Julius Giebler, Mr. <br />William Gantz, and Ms Judy Little. She stated that Mr. Gantz was the chairman <br />for the development of the Civic Plaza Master Plan and that the Plan Commission, <br />under the Historic Preservation Commission's ordinance, had the opportunity to <br />review any plan developed for the Civic Plaza area. She stated that in recent <br />months the Historic Preservation Commission had contracted with Christner <br />Partnership and Austin Tao and Associates to develop a plan for the Civic Plaza <br />Historic District. The consultants and the Commission had met with citizens and <br />members of the business district for input into the Master Plan. She stated that <br />the original idea for the Plan was E. G. Lewis' Plan for a formal government <br />center earlier in this century. The Historic Preservation Commission saw their <br />role in developing the plan as one of preserving historic features of the <br />district and improving some of the problems involving parking, pedestrian flow <br />