Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes - Plan Co~ssion <br />Page 5 <br />April 25, 1990 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Such bars installed before the effective date <br />of this subsection (insert date) may remain <br />subject to the provisions of Section 34-81 <br />until such time as there is a change in <br />ownership of the property after said date. <br /> <br />The motion was seconded by Mr. Marsh and passed by a vote of 6-0. <br /> <br />OTHER BUSINESS <br /> <br />Mr. Goldman related the City Manager's concern regarding the <br />recently adopted Zoning Code Section relating to construction of <br />fences. Plan Commission members recalled the ordinance which <br />requires the structural members of a fence to face the interior <br />of the property on which the fence is constructed. The City <br />Manager has received several calls in opposition to this <br />ordinance and suggests that those aggrieved either apply for a <br />variance of this section of the Zoning Code or support repeal of <br />the regulation. Commission members again heard several of the <br />practical problems in complying with this ordinance. Mr. Wagner <br />indicated that the City Council passed this ordinance because <br />many citizens had expressed specific support for this ordinance. <br />No action was taken by the Commission on this issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Wagner related to the Commission that the City Council had, <br />at its last meeting, approved a site plan for a retail copy <br />center at 6331 Delmar Boulevard. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kreishman indicated that she had received a memo from <br />the Park Commission expressing their concern regarding a lack of <br />notification of development proposals next to City Parks. The <br />Park Commission believes its members should have notice of such <br />development proposals at their earliest stages so that they could <br />comment on their impact on park uses. After some discussion, Ms. <br />Elwood agreed to contact the Director of the Parks Department and <br />see if notifying him in advance of the Plan Commission's agenda <br />would be sufficient notice for the Park Commission. <br /> <br />ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />As there was no further business, Mr. Foxworth moved that the <br />meeting be adjourned. Mr. Kendall seconded the motion which was <br />passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. <br /> <br />M-4-25.PLC <br />