Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes - Plan Co~ssion <br />June 27, 1990 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Ms. Elwood continued to explain that it had been suggested to <br />Planning staff that an administrative hearing provision similar to <br />that provided for the parking of recreational vehicles on <br />residential property (see section 34-52.4b3) be made available to <br />property owners who cannot comply with the new fence construction <br />requirement. Ms. Elwood stated that an administrative hearing <br />would be available to property owners who could not construct the <br />fence in the appropriate manner due to the location of a structure <br />on abutting property or some physical condition of the property <br />such as topography or presence of dense landscaping. The Zoning <br />Administrator would then hold a hearing to determine if the <br />occupants of abutting properties would be adversely affected by the <br />visibility or physical presence of the exposed structural members <br />of the proposed fence. <br /> <br />After questions by Mr. Foxworth and Mr. Safe regarding certain <br />circumstances under which an exception might be granted, Ms. Ratner <br />moved that the Plan Commission recommend adoption of the following <br />text amendment thereby amending section 34-52.5(d) of the <br />University City Zoning Code: <br /> <br />(d) All new or replacement fences shall be constructed with posts, <br />rails, framing and other exposed structural members facing the <br />interior of the property upon which they are constructed. <br />Exception: <br /> <br />(1) Construction of new or replacement fences with any <br />posts, rails, framing or other exposed structural members <br />facing a direction other than the interior of the <br />property upon which they are constructed may be permitted <br />only when specifically approved by the Zoning <br />Administrator in writing after an administrative hearing, <br />provided that the evidence at the hearing demonstrates <br />that proper construction of the fence at the desired <br />location is not possible due to the location of a <br />structure on abutting property, or that the topography, <br />presence of dense landscaping or other physical <br />conditions of the subject property and abutting <br />properties are such that the occupants of abutting <br />properties are not adversely affected by the visibility <br />or physical presence of the exposed structural members of <br />the proposed fence. Such administrative hearing shall be <br />held only upon the written request of the owner of the <br />property on which the fence is to be constructed. <br />Hearings shall be held during normal city working hours <br />and notice of the hearing shall be given at least five <br />(5) days prior to the date of the hearing to owners of <br />record of the abutting properties as shown in ci ty <br />records. <br /> <br />Mr. Kendall seconded the motion which passed by a vote of 3-2. <br />