My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1992-03-25
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
1992
>
1992-03-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2005 1:03:51 PM
Creation date
4/27/2011 11:03:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning
Document type
Minutes
Planning - Date
3/25/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />March 25, 1992 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 9 <br /> <br />Section 34-118.4 clarifies that the Zoning Administrator may disapprove a demolition permit <br />upon the recommendation of the HPC. <br /> <br />Mr. Goldman stated that he felt Section 34-112.4 should contain a separate item for maintaining <br />the register. Ms. Van Amburg stated that it could be made into a separate subsection w). <br /> <br />Ms. Kreishman stated that the phrase "state of deterioration" in Section 34-112.4 n) seems <br />vague. Ms. Ratner stated that she felt the proposed ordinance would create a whole new <br />inspection team, anticipating a different kind of inspection. Ms. Van Amburg replied that <br />currently the HPC members are not allowed in the buildings, they may recognize different things <br />than the building inspectors. Ms. Ratner stated that this creates a broad spectrum of <br />enforcement. Ms. Van Amburg stated that the number of members could be limited or a <br />representative could go on the inspections. The building inspector would be aided by the HPC <br />representative. Mr. Goldman stated that the building owner may benefit from the HPC member <br />but the building inspector is governed by the property maintenance code and his inspection <br />results therefore will not change. Ms. Kreishman stated that the inspections should be limited <br />to those by a representative of the HPC. <br /> <br />Mr. Marsh moved that the Plan Commission recommend approval of the text amendments as <br />follows: <br /> <br />SECTION 34-65 CONDITIONAL USES <br />34-65.2 APPLICATION AND SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS <br /> <br />Change to read as shown: <br />b. The application shall be filed in the office of the Zoning Administrator who shall forward the <br />application to the Plan Commission. In the case of applications for Conditional Use for an <br />historic landmark or within an historic district. the Zoning Administrator shall also forward the <br />application to the Historic Preservation Commission. The application shall contain such <br />information as the Plan Commission. may prescribe by regulations filed with the City Clerk. <br /> <br />34-65.3 REVIEW PROCEDURES <br /> <br />Add new text as shown: <br />Before any final action may be taken by the Council on an application for a conditional use the <br />Plan Commission shall hold a public hearing thereon. The Commission shall set a date for the <br />hearing and public notice of it shall be given. No application for a conditional use may be <br />approved by the Council until such hearing is held, and a written recommendation with a report <br />of findings of fact are filed with the Council by the Plan Commission. The Historic Preservation <br />Commission shall be notified of the public hearing pertaining to an historic landmark or historic <br />district and given the opportunity to present its recommendation to the Plan Commission at the <br />hearing. <br /> <br />m-J-25.plc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.