Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />April 22, 1992 Plan Commission Meeting Minutes Page 8 <br /> <br />Mr. Deutsch stated that 40 of the beds will be for skilled nursing and 20 will be for residential <br />care. <br /> <br />He further stated that he agrees with all the setbacks to Barby Lane being reduced to 20'. There <br />is a small area of 26' wide at the entrance that provides a visual off-set. This was previously <br />approved. He stated that he is all for keeping the trees along Barby and would go around the <br />trees with islands. He has no problems with conditions 1-7 as stated in the Staff <br />recommendation. Condition 8 should be changed to encompass both Phases I and II. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kreishman asked Mr. Goldman to report on the staff review. Mr. Goldman stated <br />that this was a former plant nursery which was zoned commercial from 1929 to 1970, the zoning <br />was changed to "PR-O" in 1970. The western part of the site was zoned single-family since the <br />area was annexed in 1929. The City Council approved Conditional Use #240 in January, 1986, <br />and on June 16, 1986 approved Conditional Use #241 which amended Use Permit #240. This <br />was further amended in January, 1987 and again in July 1987 to accommodate a different <br />building configuration for the nursing home plan. A copy of the twice amended Use Permit is <br />attached. After extensions of time granted by the City Council, the permit expired in 1990. <br />This application deals only with Phases II & III of the development, consisting of a one-story <br />nursing home facility. The nursing home as now proposed is substantially different from that <br />approved under Use Permit #241A. He finds the application meets the standards for conditional <br />use permit approval contained in Section 34-65.4 of the Zoning Code and complies with the <br />review considerations contained in Section 34-65.5 in all respects except that right-of-way <br />setback at Barby Lane is reduced to 20 feet and insufficient information has been submitted to <br />determine compliance with the site coverage requirements of Section 34-34.6. The site plan is <br />very tight. Condition #3 under Use Permit #241A required that buildings be set back at least <br />15 feet from driveways and parking areas, reducing the required setback to 10 feet for portions <br />of the building not containing living quarters. Several patient rooms are less than 15 feet from <br />parking lot paving and the bay windows of 10 patient rooms extend to within 12 feet of driveway <br />or parking pavement. The application indicates 80 parking spaces which appears to exceed the <br />minimum requirements of the Zoning Code; however, 34 spaces are on a separate site and 10 <br />spaces are partially in the right-of-way. He is opposed to a layout that has parking stalls that <br />back out into a street and would prefer to keep a landscaped area along the street and not lose <br />the two large existing trees. With regard to the additional 34 stall parking lot, the plan does not <br />give enough information on grades, retaining walls, landscaping areas, etc. to adequately review <br />this lot. Since it is on a separate parcel of land that is zoned "SR", it should be the subject of <br />a rezoning and a Conditional Use Amendment. The proposed nursing home will connect to the <br />apartment building at the property line between Lots 1 and 2. He does not believe it was the <br />intent of the Code to deal with this type of property division and does not recommend imposing <br />standards in property line setbacks along the property line separating the Phases. <br /> <br />He recommends approval of the application for Phases II and III with the conditions stated in <br />his written staff report. <br /> <br />m-4-22.plc <br />