Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PLAN COMMISSION <br />Minutes <br />May 26, 1993 <br /> <br />The Plan Commission held its regular meeting in the E. O. C. room located in the basement at <br />City Hall, 6801 Delmar Boulevard, University City, Missouri on May 26, 1993. The meeting <br />commenced at 7:35 p.m. with Chairperson Stephen P. Marsh presiding. <br /> <br />V oting Members Present <br />Stephen P. Marsh, Chairperson <br />Andrea Ratner, Vice Chairperson <br />Charles Foxworth <br />Carl Safe <br />Melissa Kreishman <br />Thomas E. Kahn <br />Mickey Peniston <br /> <br />V oting Members Absent <br />nla <br /> <br />Council Member Present: Mary Schuman, Council Liaison <br />Staff present: Al Goldman, Director of Planning and Frank B. Hill, Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />Chairperson Marsh stated that the Commission would now consider approval of the minutes from <br />the April 28, 1993 meeting. Ms. Kreishman stated that the name "Wagner" on page 2 paragraph <br />4 should be changed to "Wagoner." Ms. Ratner stated that the street name "Greenssfelder" on <br />page 2 paragraph 4 should be changed to "Greensfelder." Mr. Marsh stated that the motion he <br />made for approval of the resubdivision and that the motion died for lack of a second should be <br />mentioned in the minutes on page 3 paragraph 2. Mr. Safe moved for approval of the April 28, <br />1993 minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by Ms. Ratner and passed by a vote of <br />7 - O. <br /> <br />Second Hearing for Resubdivision of Part of Lots 32 and 33 of Central Suburbs (7916 <br />Teasdale) <br /> <br />Chairperson Marsh informed those present that the Plan Commission had scheduled the meeting <br />on an application from Ray Kennedy for resubdivision of Part of Lots 32 and 33 of Central <br />Suburbs (7916 Teasdale). Mr. Marsh explained that the applicant had submitted a proposal at <br />the April meeting, which was rejected by the Commission. The Commission had suggested that <br />the applicant return with a new proposal addressing the concerns of the Commission brought up <br />at that meeting. The Chairperson outlined the Commission's procedures and cri teria for <br />reviewing resubdivision applications and called for testimony from the applicant. <br />