Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1234, Minutes Page 7 <br />December 17, 1979 <br />Mayor Mooney asked Mr. Thomas Cushman, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Po- <br />lice and Firemen's Retirement Fund, if he would comment on this bill and the follow- <br />ing two, which all have to do with proposed changes in the pension plan for uni- <br />formed City employees. Mr. Cushman related the recent history of the changes which <br />are proposed for the pension plan for uniformed employees. He said the last vote <br />of the pension board to approve these changes was three to two in favor with two <br />members absent. He gave a brief description of the changes which would be brought <br />about by these bills, if they are passed. <br />Discussion followed, centering around the relative merits and possible disadvantages <br />of the proposed changes, and the amount it would cost the City and its uniformed <br />personnel. It has been estimated by the actuarial firm that the legal limit which <br />the voters set on the property tax to fund pensions will be reached a year sooner <br />under the proposed plan than it would be under the present plan. <br />Councilman Adams spoke against the proposed changes, feeling that they will be too <br />costly to the taxpayer, not at present, but in the future. He is afraid the City <br />will not be able to fund the pension in the future if the proposed changes are adop- <br />ted. <br />Councilman Metcalfe also spoke against the proposed changes, feeling that they in- <br />crease the tax liability and do not make benefits any more competitive than they <br />are now. <br />Councilman Lieberman spoke for the proposed changes, feeling it will benefit the <br />-- uniformed employees now and in the future. He felt there was no risk in terms of <br />funding the changes since the City is required by law to maintain a balanced budget. <br />He felt some way could be found to fund the plan in the future, perhaps by asking <br />the voters to increase their property tax, or a shift to some other form of funding, <br />such as revenue sharing. <br />Councilman Glickert reminded the Council that the authorization to go to $ .40 per <br />$100 valuation, which was passed by the voters several years ago, was supposed to <br />be for maintenance of the present plan and not to change it. <br />Councilman Sabol spoke in favor of the proposed changes, feeling that some way could <br />be found to fund the changes. He asked if there were not some way to invest pension <br />funds to generate more income. <br />Councilman Adams said the trustees, by law, are allowed to invest only in certain <br />areas, and he would like to see the law changed so that investments could be made <br />in vehicles which provide a greater return. At that point, it might be possible to <br />fund the proposed changes. <br />Councilman Sabol moved that Bill No. 7360 be adopted as an ordinance. Councilman <br />Lieberman seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the following vote was recorded: <br />AYES: Councilmen Lieberman, Kelley and Sabol. NAYS: Councilmen Adams, Metcalfe, <br />Glickert and Mayor Mooney. The motion was defeated by a vote of four to three. <br />BILLS FOR SECOND READING <br />BILL NO. 7361 - AMENDING CHAPTER 25 MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RETIREMENT AND PEN- <br />SIONS, BY REPEALING SECTION 25-10 THEREOF, AND ENACTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW SEC- <br />TION TO BE KNOWN AS "SECTION 25-10. CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MEMBERS GENERALLY," SO AS <br />TO INCREASE THE ASSESSMENT FROM SEVEN TO NINE PERCENT. <br />