My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-10-24 Reg
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2011
>
2011-10-24 Reg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2011 11:28:23 AM
Creation date
12/16/2011 11:28:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
10/24/2011
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Christopher Jones, 849 Westgate #303 <br />Mr. Jones lives in condominium across the street from the proposed fire station. He <br />opposed the fire station for three reasons: <br /> <br /> It will reduce his family’s quality of life with the additional noise. He said they <br />will hear diesel engines, sirens, maintenance done on trucks, employees <br />coming and leaving, washing of vehicles, and garage doors opening & closing. <br /> <br /> It will lower the property value of the residents with property next to the fire <br />station, therefore decreasing the tax base which results in lower tax revenue. <br /> <br /> It will expose the City to costly litigation expenses. <br />He considers the potential fire station a legal nuisance and his wife purchased the <br />home without knowing of the plans for the new fire station. <br /> <br />Edward McCarthy, 7101 Princeton <br />Mr. McCarthy was against the firehouse being built at this location, with these <br />methods and this procedure. He stated he was not against a new firehouse but <br />asked if it was needed and if other possibilities were looked at. He said it is not the <br />firehouses that save people but rather it is the people in the firehouse. Mr. McCarthy <br />said just because the City gets free land, it does not mean you have to build a <br />building, as it won’t be free when finished. He noted he has the right to question <br />Council, City Management, at any time. <br /> <br />Al Beamer, 894 Leland Ave <br />Mr. Beamer said on behalf of the 65 residents and 90-plus staff of Ackert Park <br />Skilled Care, they are in favor of having the new firehouse as their neighbor and <br />thought it could not be a better place to put it. <br /> <br />Judith Conoyer, 849 Westgate <br />Ms. Conoyer said she was new to the community and was aware of the possibility of <br />a new firehouse going next door when she purchased her house. She said she <br />understood the positive aspects but was concerned about the level of noise and the <br />loss of property value. Ms. Conoyer asked the City to do everything in their power to <br />mitigate the noise, exhaust fumes or anything else that might be a nuisance to the <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />Keevin Feely, 7320 Colgate <br />Mr. Feely was in favor of a new fire station. He said the previous City Manager <br />stated that the grant plus the City’s $200,000 match would get the City a new fire <br />station. Mr. Feely said the current fire station would not withstand any major <br />earthquake. He said he understood that it may not be the perfect location but there <br />will not be a perfect location in U City. <br /> <br />st <br />Hazel Erby, St. Louis County Council 1 District, 8340 Fullerton <br />Ms. Erby urged the Council to move forward with the construction of the new <br />firehouse. She said this would provide improved response time, updated facility and <br />new jobs. Ms. Erby asked that the jobs on the construction of the new facility reflect <br />the diversity of the community and the Council needs to hire a Project Manager. She <br />also asked that the positions within the fire department become more reflective of the <br />community. <br /> <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.