Laserfiche WebLink
Table 20: Summary Report of Government GHG Emissions, 2005 <br /> <br />CO₂ <br />(metric <br />tons) <br />N₂O <br />(kg) <br />CH₄ <br />(kg) <br />CO₂e <br />(metric <br />tons)xix <br />CO₂e <br />(%) (MMBtu) Cost ($) <br />Buildings & <br />Facilities 3,016 42823,03040.5%20,738 300,174 <br />Streetlights & <br />Traffic Signals 2,284 38262,29630.7%9,387 562,669 <br />Solid Waste <br />Facilities 40l 10400.5%165 3,107 <br />Vehicle Fleet 943 323795412.7%21,077 382,209 <br />Employee <br />Commute 1,108 66551,12915.1%15,575 278,884 <br />Other Process <br />Fugitive 0 00400.5%0 0 <br />Mobile Source <br />Refrigerants 0 0000.0%0 0 <br /> <br />TOTAL 7,391 1782017,491100.0%66,943 1,527,043 <br /> <br /> Figure 12: CO₂e Figure 13: Energy Use <br /> <br /> (% of Total Government Emissions) (% of Total MMBtu) <br />Careful observation of the 2005 GHG emissions data for University City’s government <br />operations, summarized in Table 20 above, shows that municipally-owned buildings and <br />facilities were the largest contributing GHG emitters. Although this sector accounted for the <br />2010-2011 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, City of University City, MO 28 <br /> <br />Buildings & Facilities-40.5% <br />Streetlights & Traffic Signals-30.7% <br />Solid Waste Facilites-0.5% <br />Vehicle Fleet-12.7% <br />Employee Commute-15.1% <br />Mobile Source Refridgerants-0.5% <br />Buildings & Facilities-31.0% <br />Streetlights & Traffic Signals-14.0% <br />Solid Waste Facilities-0.2% <br />Vehicle Fleet-31.5% <br />Employee Commute-23.3%