07/28/97 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Session 1702, Minutes July 28, 1997 weekday trash collection, fully landscaped transitional yards to protect the adjacent properties, a provision that all signs must be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Council should realize that this is a tax exempt institutional occupancy, although it will not be removed from the tax roles during the early stages of development. There is a condition that compliance be maintained with all City construction and occupancy codes. With these conditions in agreement with the applicant, Council can approve if ready to do so. Mr. Donald Beimdiek, is the attorney representing the applicant, The Church of Scientology of Missouri, He believes that Mr. Ollendorff has completely summarized the result of a number of meetings that he and his staff have held to review the plans and the proposed use of the building. This is an existing structure and there is no plans for any external construction. There will be some renovations on the interior. The City will see the same building. He believes the criteria of the City's ordinance has been complied with and the matter is ready for action unless there are further questions. Mr. Lieherman said that the operation claims to provide counseling and he would like to know what kind of counseling is to be provided, be it criminal rehabilitation, drug rehabilitation, homeless or halfway house rehabilitation. The organization says that they will rent this facility for the present time, but intends to buy it possibly in the future and therefore he would like to know if there is any consideration being given in providing the City or the School District with anything in lieu of taxes in exchange for what the City would lose as a result of that purchase. Ms. Marcie $argeant, Executive Director of the Church of Scientology, 1804 Corando, Overland, responded to Mr. Lieberman's questions. She said that the Church provides spiritual counseling, which is done on an individual basis. They do not do drug rehabilitation or any of the other counseling that Mr. Lieberman mentioned. It is strictly an individual counseling session with the aim of making a person better. As far as the property tax offsets, she had proposed to the Mayor, that she would be interested in possibly donating volunteers from the Church's parishioners to do public service work, such as painting the school, providing tutoring for students, etc. She is very open regarding this issue. Mr. Schoomer said that all monies received in lieu of taxes, must be shared with all taxing jurisdictions, if it would become an item for discussion. Responding to Mr. Schoomer, Ms Sargeant said that there was no time table for the purchase and was not ~irm. Mr. Munkel asked if any of the Church's counselors were licensed by the State of Missouri. Ms. Sargeant responded in the negative. She explained that this was pastoral counseling. Mr. Munkel asked if the counselors were degreed in any discipline. Ms. Sargeant replied that they follow a code for a spiritual counselor, but they do not go to school. They are taught religious studies in and through the Church. Mr. Wagner asked the City Manager if he was correct in assuming that the Trustees of the University Heights subdivision were satisfied that all their restrictions and indentures would be met. Mr. Schoomer commented that Mr. Ron Scott, one of the trustees for the subdivision was present tonight. Mr. Ollendorffsald that the City does not enforce the private subdivision restrictions. That is the responsibility of the subdivision trustees. It was tabled to ensure that the proposal was shown to the trustees so that they could take whatever action or interest they felt was appropriate. The City did not ask for what that action was and it is not in the City's jurisdiction to do so. The City did get a letter from the applicant stating, for the record, that they did share all of their plans and proposals with the subdivision. Mr. Ron Scott, 6942 Amherst, is a trustee for University Heights # I. Responding to Mr. Wagner, Mr. Scott said that the trustees did review the site plan proposal, but they were not submitted by the owner of the property, but by the applicant. Mr. Wagner asked Mr. Scott if he saw anything in the site plan such as parking or landscaping that might violate the subdivision codes. Mr. Scott said that he did not. Mr. Schoomer asked the City Manager to explain how the calculations for parking requirements were made. Mr. Ollendorff replied that staff looked at the number of spaces or cars that were parked at their present location as compared to the number ofstaffand others present at this site and saw that the ratio was about two people per space. The ordinance