My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-02-05 Council Agenda
Public Access
>
City Council Agenda
>
2007
>
2007-02-05 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2007 12:56:25 PM
Creation date
2/2/2007 12:53:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Meeting
Supplemental fields
Minutes - Date
1/9/2006
SESSIONNUM
1090
TYPE
REGULAR
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
VERSION 1 <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Brot asked for an explanation from Mr. Martin about the maintenance <br />agreement mentioned in the contract. She asked what “imposition” meant <br />under exhibit A in the contract. Mr. Martin said that this inferred that Charter <br />could pass on additional taxes to the City. Mr. Sharpe, Jr., asked if there <br />was any renewal clause in the contract. Mr. Martin said since Charter would <br />not agree to it, there was not any renewal clause. <br /> <br />C-3-c <br />February 5, 2007 <br />Ms. Ricci asked if there had been an <br />evaluation of the fiber system that was in place for the City. Mr. Martin said <br />that the system is four or five years old and the only City maintenance would <br />be equipment used in connection with the cable as hard drives, servers, etc. <br /> She asked if he thought the Council should be concerned with the <br />maintenance of the cable: Mr. Martin replied, no. Instead, he suggested this <br />section was just a protection for Charter. Ms. Ricci asked the meaning of <br />section 5.2 of the contract which stated what was meant by once every 12 <br />months, the rates would be reviewed. Mr. Martin said that it meant the cost <br />of living increase could be applied to the maintenance fee: although, that <br />paragraph is truly unnecessary, Charter would not eliminate it. Ms. Ricci <br />asked the City Manager if hooking up the Fire House 2 needed to be <br />addressed now. Ms. Feier said it is dependent on the passage of this <br />agreement. Right now, it is connected with a separate temporary service <br />due to the renovation there. <br /> <br />UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />BILL 8921 <br />1. — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY CITY, <br />MISSOURI, APPROVING A MASTER FIBER AGREEMENT WITH <br />CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS. <br />Bill 8921 had its second and third reading. <br />Mr. Wagner said that he was still concerned about the maintenance <br />agreement with Charter as he felt it did not use strong enough language. <br /> <br />Mr. Price moved to approve bill 8921 and the motion was seconded by Mr. <br />Glickert. <br />Roll Call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Mr. Price, Ms. Ricci, Ms. Brot, Mr. Glickert, Mr. Sharpe, Jr., and Mayor <br />Adams <br />NAYS: Mr. Wagner <br /> <br /> Bill 8921 passed and was given Ordinance No. 6679. <br /> <br />BILL 8922 <br />2. — AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8.24 OF THE <br />UNIVERSITY CITY MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO <br />NUISANCES,BY ENACTING THEREIN A NEW SECTION TO BE <br />KNOWN AS “SECTION 8.24.280 PLACES USED FOR THE <br />UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OR CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.