My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-05-23
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-05-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2012 3:07:40 PM
Creation date
12/7/2012 3:07:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Senturia asked what would happen if consideration was put off until the July meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Hoal stated that depending on the comments and the Plan Commiss <br />have to amend the plan. They would have to decide. <br /> <br />Ms. Moran asked staff what the process was to advertise for public hearings on Plan Commission <br />agendas. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that the agendas get get posted in City Hall <br />and in the Public Library. He added that staff has gone above and beyond the requirements for <br />this agenda item. <br /> <br />Ms. Locke added that it may come down to a choice about the expense of a full public hearing or <br />not. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that to be fair to people who spoke at the last meeting, they should be notified. <br /> <br />Ms. Moran asked if the consultants had a list of those who attended the public workshops. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated they did and that on the project website there was an email list for those who have <br />expressed interest. <br /> <br />Mr. Senturia stated that for a solution it sounded like there were three suggestions: 1) Hold a <br />would distribute comments; <br />2) Schedule an interim meeting between now and June 27 for Loop Special Business District <br />representatives to voice their comments; and 3) Hold a formal public hearing at the June 27 Plan <br />Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Greening asked about hearing public comments tonight and holding a public hearing on the <br />June 27 meeting agenda and people would be notified that public comments are welcome. <br /> <br />Mr. Lai stated that it would be preferred to allow public comments rather than the full public <br />hearing because it occurred at the April 25 meeting. If public comments were to be allowed <br />tonight, it would be better to have them state their opinions at the next meeting also. They would <br />have an option to wait and state their comments at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Senturia stated that it sounded like public comments should be accepted tonight; staff would <br />solicit comments between now and the June 27 meeting; and the Loop Special Business District <br />would be invited back to the meeting as well as members of the public. <br /> <br />Mr. Sharpe stated that at most meetings there would be public comments, but with limited time, <br />such as three or five minutes. He added that it was generally always acceptable at all meetings, <br />as long as the time was limited. <br /> <br />Ms. Locked asked if the agenda needed to be amended. <br /> <br />Ms. Greening stated to amend the agenda or ask them to come back next time. <br />tm; E <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.