My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-08-22
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Plan Commission
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-08-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2012 3:20:56 PM
Creation date
12/7/2012 3:20:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />find that the redevelopment plan is in conformance with the comprehensive plan update, <br />in this case of 2005. <br /> <br /> <br />-een sought with regard to the condemnation process? <br />Staff: Yes, the City Attorney has advised Staff on all matters regarding condemnation, <br />outlined the process and is currently discussing with the Attorney on various <br />aspects of the matter. <br /> <br /> <br />-Is there a representative from PGAV currently present? Staff: No <br /> <br />It was reiterated by the Staff that the <br />redevelopment plan being presented is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan Update of <br />2005 and the recommendation would be forwarded to City Council which ultimately had the <br />authority to condemn the lease. <br /> <br />Questions/Comments from the Plan Commission and responses: <br /> <br /> <br />-When the blighting issue goes before the City Council, would the tenant be notified and <br />have an opportunity to state their case? Staff: There would be a public hearing <br />th <br />conducted on the blighting analysis and redevelopment plan occurring on August 27. <br />The statutory requirement of placing the public hearing notice in the newspaper had been <br />completed, and it was noted that the tenant would be notified of the hearing beyond the <br />statutory requirement. <br /> <br /> <br />-The Plan Commission members discussed the importance that Dr. Ward be present at the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />The Chair asked if there is a motion to approve the proposal and recommend approval to City <br />Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Greening made a motion to approve the blighting analysis and redevelopment plan and that <br />the proposed development is in conformance with the 2005 Comprehensive Plan Update. The <br />motion was seconded by Ms. Moran. The motion was approved unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Halpert stated that an additional item for City Council to consider was that Dr. Ward should <br />be invited to attend the public hearing at the City Council meeting and requested that staff extend <br />the invitation. <br /> <br />Mr. Halpert expressed his concern with the delicate subject of condemnation and recommended <br />that the City move forward in a manner that would not open up further liability. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />tm; <br /> E <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.