2013-05-28 Reg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

because it was a contentious ruling about a topic that had been put onto the agenda under Council Reports/Business without a required second Councilmember’s sponsorship, without advance notice and more importantly, a misrepresentation of the topic to be discussed…which suggests a possible violation of RSMo 610.020. The exact manner in which the matter was handled is highly germane to a complete record of how this Council conducts itself. The Council meeting is no place for mean- spirited political theater, yet this has been the accepted style for over a year with the implicit, if not explicit approval of the Chair. We look to the Chair for rulings that are impartial and just, and when they are not, I believe the record of our meeting should document that. In the absence of impartiality and justice – and any real leadership by the Chair, it is incumbent upon me to remember why I was elected: to work on the business of the people. I, therefore, step forward to offer that leadership to this Council. I would ask that my esteemed fellow Councilmembers vote to approve the minutes of April 22, 2013, as they are presented by the City Clerk (without the quotes), and allow me to proudly be the one dissenting vote, that we get back to the business of the people and look forward to the time when we can rely upon leadership, impartiality and justice”. Mr. Kraft asked for a Point of Information if the motion was for the minutes of May 13, 2013. Mayor Welsch clarified stating this vote was for the minutes of April 22, 2013. Mayor Welsch stated that she thought it was not worth the time of Council to discuss whether or not one her comments at a previous meeting should be in quotes or whether a repetitive comment and stumble she made should be included in the minutes. But, if the majority of the Council votes to proceed on putting it in quotes, they had her blessing. Mayor Welsch did say the Council Rules of Order and Procedures state the Council will follow Robert’s Rules of Order, which clearly state that the minutes of an ordinary society, “Should contain mainly a record of what was done at a meeting, not what was said by members”. She noted that the majority of Council has ordered the City Clerk to produce almost-verbatim minutes which goes against the precepts of Robert’s Rules and against the advice of Counsel. Mayor Welsch stated the majority rules and she would not spend an inordinate amount of time quibbling over how the almost-verbatim minutes are presented and will contest only when a member of Council tries to change the meaning or emphasis of her comments. She asked Council to proceed to a vote and however they voted was fine with her. Mr. Price asked if that was a motion. Mayor Welsch stated there was a motion to approve the April 22, 2013, minutes and a second already on the floor. Mr. Price questioned how the corrections be made on the appeal of the ruling was not in order. Mayor Welsch said she acknowledged at the top of the meeting that a mistake was made in her ruling on the Point of Order, so that will be noted in the minutes of this meeting. The approval of the April 22, 2013 Regular session minutes were approved by a majority with a Nay vote from Ms. Carr. 2. The minutes of May 13, 2013, City Council Study Session were moved for approval by Mr. Crow and were seconded by Mr. Glickert and carried unanimously. 2