Laserfiche WebLink
<br />and Commissions, questions 3 and 4 and asked Ms. Pumm to verify that the jobs mentioned in <br />these questions are done by other staff to which the City Clerk agreed. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked the City Clerk if she was the keeper of the records or was it something that the <br />City Clerk oversees for other people. Ms. Pumm noted that she oversees others as the City <br />Clerk can assign others to be keepers of certain records. She said the staff liaison who attends <br />the commission meetings is the person who would be better equipped to post and keep the <br />minutes. Ms. Pumm said she does not see the minutes until the minutes are sent to her for <br />inclusion in the Council’s packet. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert next went to number IV - does the City Clerk make available agendas, audio and <br />minutes of the commissions was the same thing as mentioned previously. There was <br />consensus to strike this one. Under Professional Skills, question #2 - Does the City Clerk <br />represent the City well? He said it was not specific enough for a question and asked to have it <br />removed. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr said that sometimes the face of the City is the City Clerk especially with other cities or <br />other entities asking the City Clerk for something - how would the Council address that. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert said to put a question in there to that effect. He gave a couple quick examples as <br />the City Clerk interfaces with the community on an as needed basis – or - does the City Clerk <br />represent the City in dealing with the citizenry? <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert said that at the committee meetings they failed to include the objectives Council set <br />for the City Clerk last year and those should be a part of the evaluation form. <br /> <br />Mr. Crow said the subcommittee could add, in the back section, a place to talk about the <br />achievements and strong points of the clerk in the past twelve months and that could also be <br />added in on the overall rating. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert stated he would like to see input on Council’s part as it pertains to the objectives <br />that Council gave to their employees. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked if it would be worth having a section with just the objectives. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert said yes and or it could be added to the evaluation forms with the ratings. <br /> <br />Mr. Glickert next spoke on the City Manager’s evaluation form. He said essentially the same <br />thing. He noted Council needed to park the 2012-2013 objectives for the City Manager into the <br />evaluation form. He said the only other thing he would add would be to look at some of the <br />questions as the pronouns needed to go, such as “do you feel”. He said the form should be <br />analytical. <br /> <br />Mr. Price said A.2 states “Do you feel that you receive” could be changed to “Do you receive” to <br />remove the personal pronoun. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />