Laserfiche WebLink
<br />happened in those task forces would be handled by the Council, meaning Council <br />would be given the option to approve it. She stated that how the appointments <br />were made was irrelevant, as the Mayor formed this task force and requested the <br />Councilmembers to submit their nominees. She noted it did not say there was <br />any approval of that procedure. Ms. Carr noted this was not much different from <br />the logo issue or from turning off the lights at the driving range. She stated that if <br />they wanted to point to her as the former watchdog or the watchdog, then she <br />would have to agree with President Obama, that elections have consequences. <br />Ms. Carr said she was doing exactly what she was elected to do and that was to <br />remind Council to comply with the Charter. She said that the plan and the <br />ordinance brought to Council, did not comply with the Charter. Ms. Carr stated <br />that she deeply regretted that the Council was not informed prior to Mr. Kraft <br />sitting down and saying that he wanted to talk about Council Rules, when it was <br />more about whether Councilmember Paulette Carr was right or wrong. She said <br />the will of the Council was to send the plan back; to have the Plan Commission <br />take a look at it. Ms. Carr said the Plan Commission does, by Charter, have the <br />right to put together plans from time to time, but that does not supersede the final <br />authority of the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch stated that she did not believe that it was correct to bring former <br />Councilmember Lynn Ricci’s name up in this session and accuse her of moving <br />all of the social security numbers from City Hall off-site. She said it has never <br />been proven and she did not feel they should be happening under this Council. <br />Mayor Welsch reiterated that she had the authority under the Rules of Order and <br />Procedure in place in 2010, to appoint the task force. She also said that Council <br />should remember that the task force recommended that the City could consider a <br />complete streets’ ordinance. She said the task force did not bring an ordinance <br />to Council. Instead the task force talked to staff and staff brought it to Council <br />and that is the way ordinances come to Council. Mayor Welsch reminded <br />everyone that the draft plan is just that “a plan” and she hoped everyone present <br />at the last meeting and this meeting to ask to see the staff’s response to all of the <br />questions that came up at the last meeting. It detailed that it is just a plan and <br />that no one would put a trail through a private subdivision without the approval of <br />the private subdivision. Mayor Welsch stated that this was a 20 to 25 year plan. <br />She repeated again that this plan never came to Council. She said five members <br />of this Council voted to send it back to the Plan Commission, but it never came to <br />Council from the Plan Commission in the first place, which she believed was why <br />she and Mr. Glickert voted against the motion at the last meeting. Mayor Welsch <br />stated that she was not sure what the lights or logo issues had to do with the <br />discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Price commented that with his experience on the Council, the budgetary <br />actions do determine policy. He stated that if we don’t budget to fully staff police, <br />we have determined policy on what the Chief can do. He said if they decided to <br />allocate 80% of the street budget for bicycle trails then that means Council <br />decided a policy we would not fix potholes. Mr. Price said Council has to be clear <br />when they decide budget actions. He said it was not a complicated issue, but a <br />budgetary issue for him. Mr. Price said if they were not fixing the regular streets, <br />then he would hesitate to take money from streets that do not get repaired today <br />7 <br /> <br /> <br />