Laserfiche WebLink
Sessien 1629, MintTtes_ Pa~e 8 <br />Od-_r~:~r 17, 1994 <br /> <br />0 <br /> <br />north side of the road as reques~a by City staff and to ~--.~ve three <br />trees at the site rather than two live trees at the originally p~u[xsed s~ot. <br /> <br />V~AGE OF I~TERSITY PLA(~ - PIAT 4 <br /> <br />~he City Manager r~.,.,~a~a approval of Plat 4 of University Plaoe with ap- <br />pLupriate cc~diticr~ insuring that all ~ are pLu~erly c-'-,:,let~. <br />~le Plan O~,,,,i~ic~ r~-~!~nds establishing an ee~uw fee several ireroB ~ <br />nectea_ with this and prior plats, as well as o ..... ~ ~uund and scee of the <br />privately owned lots; Mr. Ollerrbrff believes there are other methods that <br /> <br />esu~uw and asks for p~t approval in o~ to proceed with devel~,ent of <br />several lots already sold. Late today, he agreed to a rec}R~t f~ the p~up- <br />erty owners that a detailed schedule and list of items to be neI~.~ired be sub- <br /> <br />are: approving dime/lsic~s for Lot #60; changing the street n~aication, and <br /> <br />Mr. Norman ~, 915 Morehouse Lane, said the subdivisic~ is not being ccm- <br />pleted pLu~erly and residents' interests not being looked after. He noted <br />the meeting held two weeks ago resultea_ in many of the is~ being Raa~essed <br />but based el past ea~_rience with the developer, residents feel scm~_ kind of <br />financial responsibility is neoessary. X4a said az~ needing artentice1 are <br />in a list recently sent to Council. Residents want Plat 4 approved since it <br />is critical to ~letlng tba subdivision, but approval should be c~ntingant <br />on their financial protectiel. He said the ~' assessment account is <br />under the develo~er's control and my be subject to m~-~se. <br /> <br />Mr. Roger Van Hem, 938 Barnard College Lane, said residents support the Plan <br />O~ission reo~endatic~ for eec~uw in view of the develc[mr's slowness to <br />cuL~lete certain it~m~ and also poor ~.~1 ity of workmanship in certain areas. <br />He circulated pho~n~ls illustrating ~ of the prob]~, and said the de- <br />veloper should be respelsible for correcting these ccraitic~. He sug~est~ a <br />number of specific tests that should be ckme to bring this about. <br /> <br />Mr. Joshua Kranzbel~, 908 Barnard College Tame, said residents are o3ncerned <br />about conditic~s in their subdivision that have worsened in the last year and <br />a half. He said there was broad-based support in the subdivisicml to require <br />an escrow f~u~ tba developer until ur~atisfactory cc~lditi~ls are correc~a. <br /> <br />M~. OlleDa_orff said the develcper's letter to Council states be does not wish <br />to provide an escrow and believes the schedule be suhnit~a is a r~lble <br />~le for making necessary improvemBnts. <br /> <br />Mr. ;u~m~ as~a if tbare %es a response f~u~ the developer about the condi- <br />ticr~ of the sidewalks and streets at the time of trar~fer to subdivisic~ <br />residents. Mr. Ollendorff said the letter details repair or replacement of <br />specific streets and sidewalks; however, there are still ar~-~ of disable- <br />meat. Mr. ~a~ms said scee of the streets ~ to have flaws not ~ to -~---~ <br /> <br /> <br />