06/06/94 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sessiel 1619, Minutes Page 5 Jt]ne 6, 1994 O O existing pcet-mourtued sig~ is at the north end of the parking lot on Delm~; a low mcr~m~t sign is p~upoeed n~a~ the public sidewalk c~ Delmav. In addi- tion, a building identification sign is p~oeed for the east face of the parking garage at a low level (facing 1-170), and a -~11 sign on a gatehouse at the entrance to the parking area. He did not mind ea ~m{nating either the poet-moun~4~_ or mm~m~nt sign, but he thought it {.~T~cant that the htild/ng eight se.~e feet, and the small sign would have the building name on it. In response to Mr. Cotter, Mr. GolSm~n said the Sign Code ~a~esses ell types of si%Ts, hut not ell have specific requix--,~nts governing the types of signs heirs3 requested, which ~kes it doubly important that the site plan aRoroval makes c]m~ what they are entitled to. He is ~ a single sign be- cause he feels nothing more is ~, not because the Code ldm{ts the build- ing to a single sign. Mr. ~a~ms asked whether there was a provision for a sign on each frontage of such a building, and Mr. Goldman said that businesses were permitted__ to have a sign on each street frontage. Mrs. Schumml asked if lar~ing changes were p~ub~ad for the south side of the building. Mr. Cohen said nc~e were ccrff--,~,la~a right now. Mrs. Sdmman said the neighbors would like to see that side of the ~ilding improved. Returning to the signage ~w~-tioa, Mr. Adams felt c~ly (me sign should be permiriaM on Delma~--either the mcr~msrfc or the poet-mounted; he elso felt there should he only c~e building identification sign on the ~-~t side which should conform with the Sign Code. Ha moved approval with thoee two restric- tices. Mr. Ootton seccraed the motion. Mrs. Sc~mmn agreeing__ there should be only c~e sign m Delm~. S~e also felt a small sign on the gatehouse would be acce~hle. Mr. Wagr~r moved to amend Mr. ~a~s, motion by ellowing a -~n~l l sign on tba gatehouse. The motic~ died for lack of a second. Mrs. Sdluman moved to amend by ellowing the gatehouse sign as well as c~e sign on Eelmar. ~ere was no second. Resp~ to Mr. Cotton, Ms. Simc~ said Brookview would like a sign on both frc~, and a small directioPal sign on the gatehouse. Mr. Cohen said that sign will face McKnight Place. Councilm~mhers Cotton, Sdluman, and Schoceer, who vot~ Nay. ~he motion car- ried four to three. Mr. Schocmp_r then move~ approval of the site plan with ell conditions, plus the amended condition. Mr. Wagner secoMe~__ the motion, and ell v~ Aye. C[]qDi'rlC~L USE - 7290 OLIVE/(}~{B~S [RIVE-TH~0UG~ RESTAURANT The City Manager said the Plan (hmassion re~a~!-nds approval of a corr~iti~ el use permit for a drive-through restaurant at 7290 Olive, subject to the following ccraiticele: