2013-10-14 Reg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Carr called for a Point of Order; we are not talking about Washington, D.C., and hurling those kinds of accusations was inappropriate. Mr. Kraft called for a Point of Sensibility; I was referring to people in Washington and not anybody here. So I do apologize if somebody here feels like they are a Tea Party person in Washington. Ms. Carr called for a Point of Order; that was a left-handed compliment. Mr. Kraft responded that he thought it was a right-handed compliment, but that’s okay. Ms. Carr advised the Mayor that what Mr. Kraft was saying is that he his sorry if somebody feels like they are a Tea Party person. Mayor Welsch stated that she thought Mr. Kraft was trying to connect this place to what is going on in Washington. But I would like Mr. Kraft to finish his comment, so that we can move on. Mr. Price called for a Point of Order; when you vote against kids and schools that’s Tea Party, and people up here have done that. Mr. Kraft stated that he would withdraw all of his comments about the Tea Party, right-hand, left-hand, and Washington, D.C., and apologize if he inadvertently offended somebody. He really was going after his non-friends in Washington, D.C. But to clarify, the idea that the administration was going to hide this from Council suggested that we are somehow incompetent here on Council. Like all of a sudden there is going to be a Bike Plan out there and we do not know anything about it, which does stretch credibility a little bit. Mr. Kraft said this is a Council/Manager form of government and he thought we have to assume that we trust our City Manager to not do something that we do not want him to do. And we trust our staff, who have really bent over backwards to be accommodating on this plan. They have gone to multiple meetings. They have talked to people. They have explained it, and they have really learned through this plan. There has been a learning curve for our staff and our citizens about how the city responds to these kinds of issues. He was impressed with how positive the remarks have been for this plan and would like to vote for it. Just for the record, Mr. Kraft stated that he wanted to mention what the objectives were in this plan, and what it was that he was voting for. Objective number one was to improve pedestrian access to UCity parks, schools and kids, by enhancing existing sidewalks, constructing new sidewalks, ADA accessible crosswalks, safe intersections, streetscapes and public realm of amenities surrounding parks and schools. It would improve the safety and comfort of pedestrian connectivity across major arterials, including Delmar, North Hanley, Midland Boulevard, North and South, Olive, the implementation of enhanced safe crosswalks, signals, safety enforcement and programming. Coordinate existing ongoing planning efforts, included the St. Louis Regional Bike Plan, Centennial Greenway, Olive Boulevard design guidelines, the Parkview Guide and Sustainability Plan, the Loop Trolley and neighboring Bike/Walk Plans, to develop a relevant bicycle and pedestrian Master Plan for UCity that contributed to city-wide and regional interconnectivity, mobility and investment. We do not have a Bike/Walk Plan now and thought it was time that we have one and he fully supports it. Mr. Sharpe asked Mr. Walker if he could provide Council with information on what an alternative plan would look like based on the fact that several private subdivisions have now opted out of having the path go through their neighborhoods. Mr. Walker stated that he would be able to provide that information. Mr. Crow asked for a motion to amend and it was second by Ms. Carr. Mr. Kraft stated that Council needed to hear the motion prior to there being a second. 19