10/18/93 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

O O Sessic~ 1604, Mj_nutes Oc~ 18, 1993 Page5 Mr. Ollendorff said the Police p~-,,~ are for officers e beats in the most ~uw~ areas of the City, as Mrs. ~-.-~a~ has often requested, but the need is not as ~L~at in the Northeast Area as in Parkvie~ Gardens. Sba read a list with suggested changes in allocaticr~; however, Mr. Ollendorff noted that scMB of the funds could ~ot be transferred as she wished because of re- In response to Fro. Price, Mr. Ollerrk=ff said the City does not fund any of the mariaM program referred to by Mr. Giger. Mr. Price said Parkview Gardens shxalld be p~u~erly maintain, hut it was outrageous that so much the Nortb~t Area. He a~e~__ there should be ~ funding for the homeless. Mrs. Sch~an said Mr. Price made it sound as if there w~s a huge discrepancy between the amount spent for policing in Parkview Gardens and the Northeast Area; but the $45,000 pays for extremely labor-intensive policing that is ne- cessary in that area because of po~ulatic~ density. She said there were few neighborhoods that require tbls type of policing b~cause the density is much less, and that Parkview Cxlrdens was getting c~ly the level of service it re- quires to meet its Mr. Schoe~_r said CDBG funds don't begin to cover tba City's needs but Coun- cil must be corK~_rned with spe~a~ng this small am~ant of money where it is Mr. Price said be would agree with Mrs. Schuman if $43,000 bed not been allo- ca~a to Parkview Gardens Multi-Family Rehab, making the area tba recipient of 38% of the block ~Lm~t funds. He felt the Nort3~t Area should get more. Ccunc~ ~ that scee amc~u~t should be r-~]lccated for tba h~meless Discussion followed, but no ccr~_nsus was reached. Mr. Ollendorff said some- thing must be approved tonight, but the allocations my be changed later. .Mr. ~a~m~ left the meet/ng at this Mr. Price moved approval of the rec~amuendaticele with the exDeption of chang- ing Parkview Gardens Police to $30,000, Northeast Area Police to $8,531, and allocating $7,000 for humeless r~as. F~B. ~b~ ~ the motion. All voted Nay e~ Mrs. ~hcm~Dson and Mr. Price, ~aho v~_ Aye. ~he motion was defeated four to two. Mr. ~ moved acce~ of the City Manager's re~-,~,~x~atic~s subject to further debate, and uz~ed that a special meeting be called for this pur- pose. Mr. Wagner seccraed the motion, which carried unanimously. Mr. Price moved that Council convene at 6:30 p.m. on November 8 prior to the regular Council meeting. Mrs. Sd~man seconded the motic~ and all voted Aye except Mr. Schoceer, who vote_ Nay. ~he motic~ carried five to one.