2014-05-27 Reg - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. Is the behavior worthy of the people who elected the individual? 7. Does the action respect others with a differing point of view? Mr. Crow stated that there has been a pretty clear pattern of conduct here and according to the citizens, you either condemn or you condone. He stated that tonight his belief is that his colleagues have made their voices known. Mr. Crow stated that when you look at Mr. Kraft’s standards, which are pretty explicit, you might want to ask yourself these questions: 1. Is this an action that breaks the rules? 2. Is this an action that discredits the body? 3. Is this an action counter to a democratically elected body? 4. Is this an action that is threatening? 5. Is this an action that is designed to intimidate? 6. Is this an action that is bullying? Mr. Crow stated that now that everyone has either heard or read the apology, and some may have even seen the Mayor’s letter, it might be interesting to hear what happened today. He stated that when he picked up his daughter at school a teacher, who is also a parent, came up to him and said, “You are going to have lots of excitement tonight. I just want you to know that as a teacher if I did what he did I would be fired. If I was sitting in a restaurant and a waiter came up to me and said what he said, that waiter would be fired.” Mr. Crow stated that at the end of the day, what everyone has witnessed are actions that have been all about political expediency and loyalty, rather than principles, doing what’s right and taking responsibility for this Council’s action. Mr. Crow said that the actions taken tonight were hypocritical would be an understatement. Dr. Carr asked if we would even be here this evening if a citizen had not made that video of Councilmember Kraft explicitly directing profanity at a citizen from the dais. This has been a pattern of behavior, and Council, has an obligation to our citizens to set the standards for our behavior and decorum. Dr. Carr stated that in fact, Council set those standards in 2011 when they censured Byron Price. The precedent has been established and must be applied equally to all, not just to those you favor. She stated that this act of directing profanity towards a citizen while on the dais is unfortunately, not a one time loss of control, but a pattern of behavior which is followed by a denial that the behaviors observed took place. Often followed by the statement “You have no proof”. Dr. Carr stated that this has also been the consistent failure of the Mayor’s leadership to address these behaviors from this Councilmember over time. She asked if an apology should be enough. Was Councilmember Kraft sorry because he regrets calling a citizen a profane name or because he was caught doing so? Dr. Carr stated that citizens have flooded her phone and email account with requests to reprimand this Councilmember for his behavior. She stated that if you listen to the statements that were made in 2011 you know that Councilmember Kraft felt that you must take action when actions break the rules or discredits the Body. Dr. Carr stated that she is befuddled that her colleagues would again seek to silence the minority voices; those voices of dissent. She asked if this was democracy. Dr. Carr stated that there is no Councilmember who has ever sat on this dais who has been under greater personal attack than her. During those times she has made eye-to–eye contact with speakers and given them their due, with the understanding that they may see things a little bit differently than she does. She stated that last week a citizen got up to talk about her dissatisfaction with her. Dr. Carr stated that she is a veteran at this, but what grabbed Ms. Norton’s attention was that this particular person, Ms. Beth Norton, said that she had come to her porch, talked with her, and that she had voted for me; thereby qualifying her disappointment. She stated that this meant something to her, because if she goes to talk to someone and made promises to them, and they voted for her, then they have a special place in terms of challenging her actions. Dr. Carr stated that she went home to look at her walk list and Ms. Norton was not listed, because she had not met the qualifications of voting often enough. So she thought that perhaps she had just walked up to her house and talked to her, but that is something that she also usually notes. Dr. Carr stated that she even looked at her mailing list to see if she had sent Ms. Norton some materials, but she was not on that list either. She stated that Ms. Norton did not vote for her. Ms. Norton did not vote for her, the county records show. The records also revealed that Ms. Norton was an endorser of both Mayor Welsch and Councilmember Glickert. Subsequently she was informed that Ms. Norton had even worked for Mr. Glickert. Dr. Carr stated that she thinks there is something that is happening in this