My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-07-14 Study Audit firms
Public Access
>
City Council Minutes
>
2014
>
2014-07-14 Study Audit firms
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2014 3:22:11 PM
Creation date
8/22/2014 3:22:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Tori said the plan is developed each year depending what may have occurred within the <br />environment over the year. He noted they make this assessment at the beginning of the audit. <br /> <br />Ms. Carr asked if a councilmember identified a question or problem, was there a mechanism that <br />would allow them to ask a question and follow-up on it. <br /> <br />Mr. Tori noted that they meet before the audit to discuss the audit plan and timing of the engagement. <br />At this time they ask for any questions that Council may have. Mr. Tori stated they also have a similar <br />meeting at the end of the audit to present the audit results. He noted they also provide their contact <br />information at their first meeting with Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Welsch asked for the highlights of their three-year engagement with University City. Mr. Tori <br />talked about identification of other matters not identified by the prior firm and asked if he could go into <br />some detail on that. <br /> <br />Mr. Tori listed: <br /> <br /> In the first year they identified material weakness and material deficiencies in internal control. <br /> Bank reconciliation processes <br /> <br /> Internal control over financial reporting <br /> <br /> Deficiencies in degradation of duties over the accounts receivables. <br /> <br /> Deficiency in the assessment of allowance of doubtful accounts <br /> <br /> Lack of documentation of internal controls <br /> <br /> Lack of a risk assessment <br /> <br /> <br /> Segregation of duties over payroll <br /> <br /> Lack of control over computer processes <br /> <br /> Accounting system that was being implemented and some improvement that could be made in <br />the documentation and training of individuals <br /> <br /> Inter-fund balances accounts as an area of improvement <br /> <br /> Federal awards cash management <br /> <br /> Library deposits not timely and whether the Library fund should be included with City financials <br />or be separate <br /> <br /> Certain actual expenditures exceeded the budget <br /> <br /> Suggested use of a check list for the closing process each month <br /> <br /> Suggested the City establish a fund balance policy <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Walker introduced the next audit firm of RubinBrown. <br /> <br />Mr. Ted Williamson, a partner in the public sector group, which focuses on audits of governments of <br />the state, county and city level. Ms. Renita Duncan is the manager in the public sector service group. <br />Mr. Williamson gave his firm’s profile noting they do have a dedicated public services group that <br />spends most or all of its time working on governmental audits. He provided RubinBrown’s expertise <br />which allows them to implement all new accounting standards. <br /> <br />Ms. Renita Duncan, Manager provided information on added values RubinBrown provides. <br /> <br /> Additional communications through ViewPoints report at end of audit <br /> <br /> Benchmarking information provided through Public Sector statistical survey <br /> <br /> Updates on industry issues via their Horizons magazine and e-focus newsletters. <br /> <br /> Education opportunities at their periodic seminars and conferences. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.