My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6467
Public Access
>
City Council Ordinances
>
2003
>
6467
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2004 2:50:08 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 12:24:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Ordinances
Passed
12/15/2003
Ordinance Number
6467
Bill Number
8699
Introdate
12/1/2003
Description
Amdg Chap 12:04 by repealing 12.04.070 right of way management to impose duities and obligations on all users of city's rights of way
Introduced By
Sharpe
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
work in the fight-of-way at any timeto ensure that all requirements of the approved permit are <br />being met by the permittee. Any ROW-user who is found to be working .in the public fight-of- <br />way without a permit or contrary to the permit requirements will be directed to stop work until a <br />permit is issued and properly posted at the work site, or until the permit requirements are met to <br />the satisfaction of the director .of public works. Any permittee found to be working without <br />providing for required safety and traffic control will be directed to stop work until the <br />appropriate measures are implemented in accordance with the current edition of the Manual on <br />Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The director of public works may order the immediate <br />cessation of any work which poses a threat to the life, health, safety, or well-being of the public. <br /> <br />M. Denial, Revocation and Appeal of Permit <br />1. Permit Denial. The director of public works may deny a permit to protect the public <br />health, safety and welfare; to prevent interference with the safety and convenience of ordinary <br />travel over the fight-of-way; or when necessary, to protect the fight-of-way and its users. Except <br />in the case of an emergency, the director of public works may automatically deny a permit for an <br />applicant in the following events: facilities work is sought which requires excavation of any <br />portion of the paved public fight-of-way which was constructed or reconstructed in the preceding <br />five years, or has a pavement condition index (PC1) greater than eighty-five (85), as determined <br />by the director of public works; the applicant, contractor or facilities owner owes undisputed <br />past-due fees from prior permits, or is in violation of the provisions of this section; the applicant, <br />contractor, or facilities owner has failed to return the public fight-of-way to its previous and <br />acceptable condition under previous permits; the facilities work will cause undue disruption to <br />existing or planned utilities, transportation, public or City use; or failure to pay for damages <br />caused to any City facilities from prior facilities work by the applicant or facilities owner. The <br />director of public works, at his or her discretion, may consider one or more of the following <br />factors in denial of the permit: the extent to which the fight-of-way space where the permit is <br />sought is available; the competing demands for the particular space in the fight-of-way; the <br />availability of other locations in the affected fight-of-way or in other fights-of-way for the <br />facilities of the applicant; the applicability of any ordinance or other regulations that affect <br />location of facilities in the right-of-way; the degree of compliance of the applicant with the terms <br />and conditions any fight-of-way use agreement with the City, this section, and other applicable <br />ordinances and regulations; the degree of disruption to surrounding communities and businesses <br />that will result from the use of that part of the fight-of-way; the condition and age of the right-of- <br />way, and whether the fight-of-way was constructed or reconstructed within the preceding five <br />years; the balancing of the costs of disruption to the public and damage to the fight-of-way, <br />against the benefits to that part of the public served by the construction in the fight-of-way; <br />whether the applicant maintains a current registration with the City; whether the applicant has <br />failed within the last three years to comply with, or is presently not in full compliance with, the <br />requirements of this section; whether the applicant owes monies to the City; whether the issuance <br />of a right-of-way permit for the particular dates and/or time requested would cause a conflict or <br />interfere with an exhibition, celebration, festival, or any other event. In exercising this <br />discretion, the director of public works shall be guided by the safety and convenience of <br />anticipated travel of the public over the fight-of-way. Notwithstanding the above provisions, the <br />director of public works may, in his or her discretion, issue a right-of-way permit in any case <br />where the permit is necessary to prevent substantial economic hardship to a user of the <br />applicant's service, and allow such user to materially improve the service provided by the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />2. Permit Revocation, The director of public works may revoke any fight-of-way permit, <br />without refund of the permit fee, in the event of a substantial breach of the terms and conditions <br />of any law or the fight-of-way permit. A substantial breach shall include, but not be limited to, <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.