My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6738
Public Access
>
City Council Ordinances
>
2008
>
6738
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2012 12:56:07 PM
Creation date
11/5/2014 12:25:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Ordinances
Passed
4/21/2008
Ordinance Number
6738
Bill Number
8985
Introdate
3/24/2008
Description
Blighted area redevelopment area known as Olive Boulevard and Midland
Introduced By
Mr. Glickert
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
s <br /> OLIVE&MIDLAND URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT AREA <br /> UNIVERSITY CITY LAND CLEARANCE FOR REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ¢; <br /> The entire Area is zoned GC - "General Commercial District". The requirements of the <br /> GC zoning district dictate that: 1) Development must occur on sites of at least 0.3 acres; <br /> 2)The minimum property line setback requirement shall be twenty (25)feet if adjacent to <br /> a residential district; and 3) Buildings and site improvements such as parking must not <br /> occupy more than seventy (70) percent of the total land area of the parcel if it is 20,000 <br /> square feet or greater in size. 4 <br /> Before Olive Boulevard was widened to four lanes, single family residential uses were <br /> predominant along Olive Boulevard. The widening of Olive Boulevard increased the <br /> number of commercial land uses along the Boulevard and many formerly single-family <br /> parcels were consolidated for commercial uses. As can be seen from the Plate 1, the <br /> platting of the parcels fronting Olive Boulevard in the Area reflects the pattern of platting } <br /> in the single-family subdivision immediately to the north. As is the case with Parcel 1, <br /> the former single-family structure was converted into commercial uses while the <br /> underlying platting did not change. Parcel 1 is of insufficient size (0.13 acres) and is a <br /> non-conforming with the City's zoning code for development within the GC zoning <br /> classification. For example, the "parking area" at the rear of Parcel 1 may only be <br /> accessed through the drive-aisle of Parcel 2. i <br /> } <br /> The other minimum standards of the GC zoning classification effectively render any E <br /> parcel size less than 0.5 to 0.75 acres obsolete due to the limited number of commercial <br /> uses that will meet off-street parking and loading requirements as well as green space, <br /> landscaping and other site improvement guidelines for coverage on a property. <br /> Contemporary retail and commercial development standards typically establish 0.5 to t <br /> 0.75 acres as a minimum lot size to effectively meet the design and parking ' <br /> requirements for end users and businesses. In addition, the City has implemented a <br /> program of property acquisition and consolidation for purposes of promoting more easily <br /> developable and unified redevelopment projects through the use of TIF. Redevelopment <br /> of single properties below 0.5 to 0.75 acres would not encourage contemporary <br /> development principles in support of unified and planned commercial development as <br /> supported by the City. As such, Parcel 2 (0.47 acres) is also considered obsolete by <br /> contemporary development standards and the City's objectives for revitalization of the <br /> Olive Boulevard corridor. <br /> E. ECONOMIC LIABILITY <br /> The Area is an economic liability for the City due to the substandard property and sales <br /> tax revenue generated within the Area. The estimated assessed value per square foot <br /> of the properties (land and improvements) within the Area is $4.18. The estimated <br /> assessed value of commercial properties within the City of University City is $5.51. The <br /> valuation differential of approximately $1.33 per square foot equates to twenty-four (24) <br /> percent less in real property tax revenue being generated within the Area as compared <br /> to the average for commercial properties within the City as a whole (see Table 2-1, EAV <br /> per Square Foot). The physical deterioration of buildings and site improvements, <br /> inadequate street layout, and obsolete platting have impeded reinvestment in the <br /> properties. These conditions contribute to lower lease rates and attract tenants unable <br /> or unwilling to pay higher lease rates. These lower lease rates suppress the market and <br /> assessed value of the property and also serve as a disincentive for reinvestment by <br /> property owners. In many cases, the cycle of disinvestment continues unless public <br /> assistance is provided to remedy impediments. <br /> 80759 6 PGAVU RBANCO NS U LTI N G <br /> 1/08/08 <br /> April 7, 2008 J-1 to 6-28 <br /> } <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.