HPC_minutes_2014_11_20_approved - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the proposed garage. He stated that the shape of the lot was restrictive to the location of the detached garage. Questions, Comments, and Discussion: -Commission members discussed the setbacks and location of buildings in the Historic District, comparison of surrounding lot sizes, the shape of the existing lot, and the location and height of the proposed garage. -Commission members expressed concern about the potential impact of the two-story garage as opposed to other detached garages in the subdivision that were one-story structures. -Commission members noted that the trapezoidal shape of the lot as compared to surrounding rectangular lots. It was also noted by Commission members that the proposed orientation of the garage, at an angle rather than parallel to the property line, could reduce the perceived prominence in comparison to the development pattern and location of buildings on surrounding property. -Commission members discussed a setback of ten feet as a compromise to allow additional space from the existing dwelling while respecting the character and scale established within the historic district. A motion was made by Mr. Wesenberg to recommend to the Board of Adjustment that a minimum setback of 10 feet from the northern property boundary be maintained, rather than the 5 feet as requested by the applicant, in keeping with the character and scale of other structures within the historic district. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hamilton and carried unanimously. 5. Other Business 5.a. Public Comments There were no further public comments. 6. Reports 6.a. Council Liaison Report Mr. Jennings had no update. 6.b. Department Report: Update from staff Staff had no update. 7. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm. tğŭĻ Ћ ƚŅ Ћ