Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />-Plan Commission members asked about the proposal and how it fit with the intent and <br />changes were consistent with the intent and purpose of both Districts. <br /> <br />-Plan Commission members asked about how the proposed changes would impact properties <br />owned by Washington University and if the changes could open the door for large-scale <br />redevelopment by Washington University. Staff stated that the proposed Text Amendments <br />would not open the door for large-scale redevelopment as the process for such development <br />would remain the same as under the current regulations. <br /> <br />-Plan Commission members asked if there were any requirements for buffering between <br />garden apartments and single family residential property. Staff stated that this issue could <br />be addressed by the CRC at a future meeting. <br /> <br />-Plan Commission members discussed changes to some of the wording proposed under the <br />Garden Apartment <br />adjacent to property line of adjacent lot in the same zoning district. <br /> <br /> <br />-Plan Commission members stated there were no additional concerns regarding the proposed <br /> Planned Development District site size or floor area regulations <br /> <br /> <br />A motion was made by Mr. Miller for the CRC to recommend that the Plan Commission <br />approve the proposed Text Amendment pertaining to multi-family residential development <br />regulations, site size for Planned Development Districts, and floor area regulations for <br />buildings in the GC General Commercial District, CC Core Commercial District, and IC <br />Industrial Commercial District, with the changes as discussed. The motion was seconded by <br />Mr. Jones and carried by a vote of 2 to 0. <br /> <br />The study session adjourned at 6:30 pm. <br />tğŭĻ Ћ ƚŅ Ћ <br />