Laserfiche WebLink
Session 1822 <br />October 20, 2001 <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman was curious as to what occurred with Ms. Wood's memo of September 8th <br />detailing her concerns and questions about the upcoming sales tax and bond election on <br />November 6th. Mr. Ollendorff stated that he responded to her in writing, on behalf of the <br />entire Council, the City's viewpoints and positions regarding the need for the sales tax <br />increases and bond election. They basically respectfully disagreed with each other's <br />positions on the matter. <br /> <br />AGENDA #8 - METROLINK FUNDING: <br /> <br />Mr. Lieberman reported that Tom Curran with the St. Louis County Department of Planning <br />had met with him, Mr. Wagner and others concerning MetroLink funding in relationship to <br />the problems at the track adjacent to Parkview Subdivision. Mr. Curran reported that it <br />would cost approximately $45 million dollars to move the sewer system in a way that <br />would allow the track to move farther away from the Parkview Subdivision. Mr. Curran was <br />interested in determining whether the City would be interested in participating in some type <br />of funding assistance with other organizations or funding sources. Bi-State may consider <br />the proposal if others fund the project. Mr. Lieberman asked if the City would consider <br />participating in funding for this endeavor, by possibly a future tax election? Other funding <br />avenues certainly would have to be found, as well. The City could not afford to fund this in <br />its entirety, but no other organization was willing to commit to funding unless University <br />City participated. Mr. Wagner strongly supported Mr. Lieberman's request. Mr. Ollendorff <br />and the Mayor both agreed that it was a bad idea to further prop up the Parkview <br />Subdivision's hopes like this, because it would be highly unlikely, due to the current <br />financial and taxing concerns of the citizens and the City, to obtain this type of funding. <br />The City is looking at a loss of revenue and is going to the polls for tax increases. The <br />discussion centered at this point on what other types of funding could be located. <br />Transportation, state and federal grants would need to be located. The sense of the Council <br />was to say that they would be willing to talk further about finding funding sources. <br /> <br />AGENDA #9 - HARRIETT WOODS' WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY PLAN: <br />Mayor Adams reported that this was really a school district proposal that he has been <br />asked to present along with Superintendent Vern Moore to Chancellor Wrighton and his <br />staff. He asked that Council review the plan and prepare comments or questions in the <br />next few weeks. This plan will be a way in which Washington University can support our <br />citizens through the school system. There were some sentiment among Council that this <br />did not help the cash flow situation. Mr. Ollendorff responded that the University would be <br />paying the City $90,000 annually for police services. The property that Washington <br />University had purchased would cause the City to lose $60,000 in taxes. <br /> <br />AGENDA #10 - TROLLEY STUDY: <br /> <br />Mr. Schoomer asked for a status report on the trolley study. Mr. Ollendorff reported that <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />