My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
BOA_Minutes_2015_11_16_Draft
Public Access
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Board of Adjustment
>
Minutes
>
2015
>
BOA_Minutes_2015_11_16_Draft
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2016 4:11:05 PM
Creation date
1/7/2016 4:11:05 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Board of Adjustment <br />November 16, 2015 Meeting Minutes <br />A Board of Adjustment meeting was held on Monday November 16, 2015 at the Heman Park <br />Community Center located at 975 Pennsylvania Ave., University City, Missouri. The meeting <br />commenced at 6:30 pm. <br />Members Present Members Absent (excused) <br />John Solodar, Chairperson Deborah Arbogast, Vice-Chairperson <br />Peggy Holly Kathy Straatmann <br />Roger McFarland <br />Charles Marentette, Alternate <br />Denise Anderson, Alternate <br />Non-Voting Members Present <br /> <br />Rod Jennings, Council Liaison <br />Staff Present <br />Zach Greatens, Planner <br />1. Approval of Minutes <br /> <br />The minutes from the January 20, 2015 Board of Adjustment meeting were approved. <br />2. Case # BOA 15-02 512 Mapleview Drive <br />Mr. Ben Ellerman with Blaes Architects, on behalf of STL Homebuyers, LLC, property <br />owner, requested a variance to construct a covered front porch for the existing single family <br />dwelling with a porch roof projecting 9.9 feet into the front yard setback, exceeding the <br />maximum allowable roof projection of four (4) feet by 5.9 feet as required by Section <br />400.1040 Single Family Residential <br />District. <br />Mr. Ellerman explained the proposal and noted that the porch itself was proposed to extend <br />eight (8) feet from the dwelling and the roof overhang was proposed to project 9.9 feet into the <br />setback. An option to build the terrace portion only had already been submitted for building <br />permit approval. The terrace portion was allowed to be built as proposed. The terrace would <br />be constructed whether the current variance request was approved or not. He stated that the <br />Zoning Code allowed only a four (4) foot overhang for the porch roof which did not allow for <br />enough space for a future buyer to make suitable use of the front porch. He added that the <br />property had a platted 35-foot front yard setback which superseded the Zoning Code <br />requirement for 25 feet and further restricted the property. <br />ng Code <br />for the front porch. <br />Public Comments <br />tğŭĻ Њ ƚŅ Ќ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.